Shri
Mr. Glass
Got to the final with 4 bowlers. This is good advice.5 man bowling attacks are a complete waste of time when you leave the AI in charge.
stack that batting.
Got to the final with 4 bowlers. This is good advice.5 man bowling attacks are a complete waste of time when you leave the AI in charge.
stack that batting.
How does Gavaskar stays in the 70s? What logic have you applied here?- 1800's - AndrewB
- 1900's & 1910's - Howe_zat
- 1920's & early 1930's - mr_mister
- late 1930's & 1940's - morgieb
- 1950's - ImpatientLime
- 1960's
- 1970's - The Battlers Prince
- 1980's - kingkallis
- 1990's - Shri
- 2000's - Daemon
- 2010's - Nate
Tendulkar
90s - 1 vote
00s - 1 vote
Vedrict: Deadlock, Tendulkar stays in the 90s
McGrath
90s - 2 votes
00s - 2 votes
Verdict: Deadlock, McGrath stays in the 90s
Gavaskar
70s - 1 vote
80s - 1 vote
Verdict: Deadlock, Gavaskar stays in the 70s
No comments.Your point stands if its 99 or something or if a guy played one game in the decade and came back in the next decade after going back domestic cricket. McGrath had an ATG career in the 90s before continuing it in the 00s. You are being deliberately obtuse in addition to being a conniving piece of ****. And it is not the first time either. **** off.
Gavaskar played for 9 years in the 70s and 8 in the 80's. India played less Test cricket in the 70's than the 80's, because of this I believe using games played as the solitary deciding factor to be unfair. It's nothing against you personally bro.How does Gavaskar stays in the 70s? What logic have you applied here?
Wow, great job on the statistics Nate!Depends what you were after. His economy rate was the best of your bowlers.
Watson WAG.
You know what they say - Lynnsanity is doing the same thing again and again, and expecting different results.
Warne - 28 @ 19.29, 4.48
Watson - 26 @ 16.77, 6.00
Lee - 21 @ 36.57, 6.19
Lillee - 19 @ 25.00, 4.90
McGrath - 12 @ 43.50, 4.14
Hussey - 4 @ 27.50, 5.24
Mallett - 1 @ 91.00, 7.00
Bracken - 0 @ N/A, 6.14 (7 overs bowled)
Bevan - 0 @ N/A, 7.00 (9 overs bowled)
Symonds - 0 @ N/A, 5.76 (21 overs bowled)
You have tainted the Bracken name, and I expect a formal apology.
Relax bro, I never said you were being personal here. Its just that the concept lacks consistency if you award players to particular decade like that.Gavaskar played for 9 years in the 70s and 8 in the 80's. India played less Test cricket in the 70's than the 80's, because of this I believe using games played as the solitary deciding factor to be unfair. It's nothing against you personally bro.
If you really want Gavaskar KK feel free to just ask TBP if you can have him. TBP might want to go with Richards and Boycott anyway.
You will still make it to the semis with itCan I get a best of the rest team to compete in this?
I have Clive Rice as well!! Confused if I should include him in the playing XI or not.The FC records in my squad are mental. I knew it would kind of be the case which is why I went early days but these allround figures are way better than I thought.
Warwick Armstrong: 16158 runs at 46.83, 45 tons; 832 wickets at 19.71, 50 goddam five-fors
Imma bat down to 11
Yes....I have Clive Rice as well!! Confused if I should include him in the playing XI or not.
Yes, we now have 13 players. Let's cap this off at 14, need one more player.Can I get a best of the rest team to compete in this?