• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Most disgraceful moment in cricket history?

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Think you might mean this.

Either way, yeah, it was poor, but there've been worse (Bodyline, match-fixing, Zimbabwe).
 

archie mac

International Coach
Match-fixing & Bodyline >>>>>>>>>> all of them.

And Zimbabwe too.
I think BL turned out to be a great thing

As for match fixing, it is not something that we really know. I mean how many times has it happened and we have had no idea?
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
I think BL turned out to be a great thing
Its presence makes cricket history a far more fascinating thing than it would be without, and good things resulted from it (ie, the assurance that it would never happen again). But it was a horrible, horrible thing to happen, and caused trauma the like which cricket has rarely known.
As for match fixing, it is not something that we really know. I mean how many times has it happened and we have had no idea?
A lot, probably. How does that impact upon the stuff we do know about?
 

archie mac

International Coach
Its presence makes cricket history a far more fascinating thing than it would be without, and good things resulted from it (ie, the assurance that it would never happen again). But it was a horrible, horrible thing to happen, and caused trauma the like which cricket has rarely known.

A lot, probably. How does that impact upon the stuff we do know about?
It is hard to quantify, where as underarm was transparent:)
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
I'd say the Cronje\Azharuddin revelations in 2000 were enough of a "one off event" to qualify as worse than the underarm or Ovalgate affairs.

And with Zimbabwe, the whole point is that it isn't a one-off thing, but a constant, ongoing saga that has caused several severe problems over the last 5 or 6 years.
 

Lillian Thomson

Hall of Fame Member
It's a shame that Colin Croft's barge on the umpire doesn't show up on youtube, I haven't seen it since they showed in on Grandstand the day after it happened.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
First Test I ever watched that. Cairns and Nash was superb on the first day; our batting less so.
It's scary that there's people who can say that a Test on YouTube is the first they've ever watched. :mellow:

I wish I could find some YT footage of that game in 1992 where Gooch was wrongly given not-out, which was the 3rd I watched and remember.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Yes, New Zealand did have TV in 1979/80...
India had TV in 1978, but not a single ball of cricket had ever been televised.

I seem to recall someone - might have been 16toS - saying NZ didn't get TV coverage of cricket until the 1980s.
 

Lillian Thomson

Hall of Fame Member
India had TV in 1978, but not a single ball of cricket had ever been televised.

There was footage of Keith Fletcher and Tony Greig batting in India on the 1972/73 tour. It was recorded for news bulletins rather than ball by ball broadcasts by a TV company.
Probably the same with the Croft incident.
 

Top