who's more aussie

[Richard]

There are weirdos in every breed, I suppose (no offence Pete, but mostly the nice guys such as yourself still hated him).

 

[Richard]

Beevs on MSN was gun, much more laid back.

I know that too, you said it as well.

For me, though, a **** is a ****. The mode of communication doesn't change this.

 

[andyc]

Thought Beevs was gun, personally.

Yeah, I liked him as well.

I thought he was hilarious. Biting northern sense of humour always goes down well.

AWTA.

 

[steds]

Didn't necessarily like him, but found him very funny.

 

[Hoggy31]

There are weirdos in every breed, I suppose (no offence Pete, but mostly the nice guys such as yourself still hated him).

Look in the mirror, you're a ****in' creeeeeeeeeep.

 

[dontcloseyoureyes]

Chba.

 

[Richard]

Look in the mirror, you're a ****in' creeeeeeeeeep.

Good obs, Einstein.

 

[Matteh]

I know that too, you said it as well.

For me, though, a **** is a ****. The mode of communication doesn't change this.

In some cases yes, that is the case. But it's a sweeping generalisation to say it for every case.

 

[alternative]

Same here, gotta agree with the lot. Beevs seemed to be a gun.

 

[nightprowler10]

Didn't necessarily like him, but found him very funny.

Ditto.

 

[PhoenixFire]

Found him personally someone who I'd never got on with, but you can't deny that he wasn't hilarious at times.

 

[Richard]

Hmm. For me, an idiot's humour is by default defunct. I basically refuse to laugh on principle. And given that there was essentially nothing I liked about Beevs, and several hundreds things I hated, the way I see it I have no business finding him funny, especially when so many of his "jokes" were attempted at my expense.

 

[PhoenixFire]

You can still find things amusing about him though, or I could at least. I could read his rants about cricket related things all day and never fail to be entertained, even if I thought that the actual content was total rubbish.

 

[nightprowler10]

I basically refuse to laugh on principle.

 

[Richard]

Might be Rolleyes-worthy to you, it's fine and upstanding to me (which is why I act in such a way).

 

[Richard]

You can still find things amusing about him though, or I could at least. I could read his rants about cricket related things all day and never fail to be entertained, even if I thought that the actual content was total rubbish.

Amusing in a "haha, what an idiot" way, sure - same thing true of SW\BLE. But it annoyed me that anyone took him seriously when he tended towards arguing that Gordon Muchall > Michael Vaughan or Stephen Harmison > Matthew Hoggard. And it annoyed me when anyone took SW\BLE seriously too, especially if they knew who he was.

 

[PhoenixFire]

More like when he was complaining about stuff, more football actually, was pretty clever that way.

 

[Richard]

Well I read neither the GSF nor battrick, so despite hearing of his good deeds there I've taken no interest in them - my opinion was already formed, TBH.

 

[nightprowler10]

Well I read neither the GSF nor battrick, so despite hearing of his good deeds there I've taken no interest in them - my opinion was already formed, TBH.

What an open minded person you are.

 

[Richard]

A bigoted numpty who's been nothing but (and I mean nothing but - every single of his posts in my direction was of a negative tone) unpleasant to me is a bigoted numpty who's been nothing but unpleasant to me IMO, and I honestly couldn't care less whether he helps a few people play some online cricket-management game TBH.