Go Back   Cricket Web > Cricket Discussion > Cricket Chat



Finding Seams on Apples - Order Your Copy!


View Poll Results: In which format(s), if any, should Michael Clarke be playing for Australia?
Tests, ODIs and 20/20 5 8.33%
Tests and ODIs 38 63.33%
Tests and 20/20 0 0%
ODIs and 20/20 0 0%
Tests only 14 23.33%
ODIs only 0 0%
20/20 only 3 5.00%
Voters: 60. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 19-09-2004, 12:01 AM   #16 (permalink)
International Vice-Captain
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: .
Posts: 4,710
Certainly a lot of potential. He was overhyped too early and had far to much pressure on him at such a young age. I personally think he will become a very good player, but he is a long way off the test side at the moment.

As for Watson, I don't think much of him, I would rather play Symonds...(sounds crazy eh?)
Mr. P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2004, 12:42 AM   #17 (permalink)
Hall of Fame Member
 
luckyeddie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Derby, England
Posts: 17,617
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. P
As for Watson, I don't think much of him, I would rather play Symonds...(sounds crazy eh?)
Sounds eminently sensible to me (at least for a try) - he's not exactly had a fair crack of the whip in the big game
__________________
Nigel Clough's Black and White Army, beating Forest away with 10 men
luckyeddie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2004, 12:58 AM   #18 (permalink)
State 12th Man
 
Jnr.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Queensland
Posts: 785
To me, Watson seems like he would be a better Test player than he would be an ODI player (ie I think he is better suited to the longer form of the game).
Jnr. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2004, 04:28 AM   #19 (permalink)
Cricket Web XI Moderator
 
lord_of_darkness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Auckland , New Zealand
Posts: 13,252
Quote:
Sounds eminently sensible to me (at least for a try) - he's not exactly had a fair crack of the whip in the big game
I think symonds would do quite well considering the form he has been having he does deserve a lot more opportunities.. but the australian board is probably looking to mould youth / future of australian cricket so they will continue to persist with watson..
__________________
Don L-o-d , Legion Of Doom

Lords Lounge, Off Topic, The Happening Place in CW and OT.

Co Chairman CWBCC - Cricketweb XI - CW Green | Manager of Hampshire CC - Wccc | Chairman of the Muralitharan Supporters Club ~MSC~ |

Current Stats:
2* - 17-4-35-3 - Season Ends..

Current Record
Batting - RHB: M:48 Inns:43 Runs:457 H/S:33* Ave:15.5 N.O:10
Bowling - Off Spin: O:280 M:40 Runs:975 Wickets:104 Ave:9.3 S.R:15.6
lord_of_darkness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2004, 06:56 AM   #20 (permalink)
Eyes not spreadsheets
 
marc71178's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: England
Posts: 56,334
Quote:
Originally Posted by Son Of Coco
Like I said on another thread, Watson's only 23 - Flintoff wasn't much when he was the same age

He wasn't bowling properly then.

It's only in the last 2 years or so he's been bowling properly.
__________________
marc71178 - President and founding member of AAAS - we don't only appreciate when he does well, but also when he's not quite so good!

Anyone want to join the Society?

Beware the evils of Kit-Kats - they're immoral apparently.
marc71178 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2004, 06:59 AM   #21 (permalink)
Eyes not spreadsheets
 
marc71178's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: England
Posts: 56,334
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eclipse
Dont underestmate Watson it looks now as though his bowling is not going to reach a very high standerd but his batting is world class..

Batting is World Class despite the fact he's not played a Test and his ODI average owes more than a little to his 9 not outs from 17 (he doesn't even score quickly in ODIs!)

Surely one can only be a World Class batsman when they play Internationally?
marc71178 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2004, 07:00 AM   #22 (permalink)
International Vice-Captain
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: .
Posts: 4,710
Bowling properly? How is that an excuse?

Watson isn't bowling properly now.

It's only in the next 2 years or so he'll be bowling properly.
Mr. P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2004, 07:02 AM   #23 (permalink)
International Vice-Captain
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: .
Posts: 4,710
Quote:
Originally Posted by marc71178
Surely one can only be a World Class batsman when they play Internationally?
One could argue against that. (Hick?)
Mr. P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2004, 07:10 AM   #24 (permalink)
Eyes not spreadsheets
 
marc71178's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: England
Posts: 56,334
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. P
Bowling properly? How is that an excuse?

All Rounders need to both bat and bowl.

Owing to injuries, at 23 or so, Flintoff wasn't bowling.
marc71178 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2004, 07:11 AM   #25 (permalink)
Eyes not spreadsheets
 
marc71178's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: England
Posts: 56,334
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. P
One could argue against that. (Hick?)
World Class?

Don't think so.
marc71178 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2004, 07:14 AM   #26 (permalink)
International Vice-Captain
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: .
Posts: 4,710
Hmm I suppose it depends on how you define "world class"

Some people here seem to think Tikolo and Odumbe are world class, I think Bashar is world class...so I don't see how Hick isn't. He has such a superb record, just unfulfilled at international level but I don't think that means he was a not-so-great player...

Put it down to whatever you want, but Hick has to be rated highly IMO...
Mr. P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2004, 07:16 AM   #27 (permalink)
Eyes not spreadsheets
 
marc71178's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: England
Posts: 56,334
World Class performers can only be called world class by playing at the highest level.
marc71178 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2004, 07:18 AM   #28 (permalink)
International Vice-Captain
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: .
Posts: 4,710
Maybe yes. Maybe no.

Who would you rate higher, Tikolo or Blewett?
Mr. P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2004, 09:28 AM   #29 (permalink)
Eyes not spreadsheets
 
marc71178's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: England
Posts: 56,334
In terms of World Class, neither.
marc71178 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2004, 12:25 PM   #30 (permalink)
Hall of Fame Member
 
Son Of Coco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 16,059
Quote:
Originally Posted by marc71178
He wasn't bowling properly then.

It's only in the last 2 years or so he's been bowling properly.
Averages suggest he certainly wasn't, Watson's coming back from injury, is it fair to suggest he's not bowling properly too?
Son Of Coco is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Giles Clarke, Free to air ashes series jwebber86 Cricket Chat 3 20-01-2010 05:11 PM
Trade Discussion Thread Simon World Club Cricket 137 15-04-2009 03:15 PM
*Official* Exam Stress Reliever and Discussion Thread masterblaster Off Topic 185 29-11-2008 10:24 AM
Trade Discussion Thread Simon World Club Cricket 41 04-10-2008 01:01 PM
Surrey 2002: A Cricket Captain Diary SIX AND OUT General 6 17-02-2005 08:25 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:20 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright ©2001 - 2011, Cricket Web