yeah, kohli's peak points (937) don't seem much lesser than Smith's(947) but given the exponential scale of ratings it could literally be equivalent to difference between 700 and 800.Let's also talk about tests? Smith clearly the better test batsmen. 2nd highest rating points ever, and 2nd highest batting average (sample size not lol). Kohli is far behind. Thoughts?
I have received a warning so I should not say much, but that's not what the joke was.yeah, kohli's peak points (937) don't seem much lesser than Smith's(947) but given the exponential scale of ratings it could literally be equivalent to difference between 700 and 800.
Edit- missed Ankit's joke, changing my views to Smith sucks, isn't fit to sandpaper Kohli's balls.
I got the joke I just wanted to make a sandpaper one. (I received one too btw :P )I have received a warning so I should not say much, but that's not what the joke was.
This but unironically.Believe "Create thread" button is going to get locked soon. Actually new threads should be created only by moderators imo. That way, the forum will have a better look and structure.
Is this off-topic?
In all seriousness, Smith v Kohli as Test match batsmen, sure. Smith v Kohli as ODI cricketers in response to the other one being Test-specific, fair enough.
Smith v Kohli as FC wicketkeepers? Take it to Testing Forum.
Let's also talk about tests? Smith clearly the better test batsmen. 2nd highest rating points ever, and 2nd highest batting average (sample size not lol). Kohli is far behind. Thoughts?
I've never heard of this, but it looks incredible.Been invited to my best friends house for CNY dinner tonight. There's Cod on the menu and the usual snacks like bak kwa, pineapple tarts, salted egg chips etc. **** I love this time of the year.
thanks now I'm recoiling at the thought of one's balls being sandpaperedyeah, kohli's peak points (937) don't seem much lesser than Smith's(947) but given the exponential scale of ratings it could literally be equivalent to difference between 700 and 800.
Edit- missed Ankit's joke, changing my views to Smith sucks, isn't fit to sandpaper Kohli's balls.
Oh it's seriously great. Think jerky but fattier and juicier because its pork. It's also slightly sweet.I've never heard of this, but it looks incredible.
Bancroft seemed okay with it.thanks now I'm recoiling at the thought of one's balls being sandpapered
What ointment you used?Had scabies on my balls once. Thankfully I couldn't get my hands on any sandpaper.
Well, it's a bigger sample size than the number of tests Lillee played in the SC, for which he's called out. So, you know...Most of those games were in 2010 or so when he was not great.
Of the rest he’s had 98*, 58* and a 40 odd which was the top score in the rain reduced CT finals against England.
Notable failures include 2015 semi finals, 2017 CT finals and 2019 semi finals.
Overall not a huge sample size but definitely something of concern.
Even if he scored a golden in all those games he’s still comfortably better than Smith though.
This sounds like an annoying STD.Some massive sales going on as well. Just booked tickets to Krabi for $110 return.