• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

The Cosy Club crumbling ??? . . . Indian Apex court out to set BCCI's house in order

SJS

Hall of Fame Member
Gavaskar at best, a reluctant administrator
N Ananthanarayanan, Hindustan Times
New Delhi, March 29, 2014

The current crisis in Indian cricket was triggered by corruption in the Indian Premier League and allegations of conflict of interest against N Srinivasan. Thus the Supreme Court’s interim orders on Friday focused a lot on Sunil Gavaskar’s appointment.

Having suggested the former India skipper should head the Board whose credibility is at its lowest ebb, the apex court has made him only the ‘IPL 7 president’, one tasked with running the league with BCCI vice-president Shivlal Yadav to handle the rest of the affairs. There will be no over-arching role for Gavaskar.

Will he deliver?
But the big question is whether Gavaskar will be up to cleaning the mess that the IPL has become following last year’s spot-fixing scandal. Gavaskar himself has had to ward of criticism about conflict of interest due to his lucrative commentary contract with the BCCI.

In his book West Indies fast bowler Mike Holding rated England’s Geoff Boycott as a better opener because he felt, when conditions were tough for batting, Gavaskar was happy to let his partner face the music. His 13 Test tons against West Indies in its pomp puts that assessment in perspective but Gavaskar has been more a bystander than someone willing to dirty his hands as an administrator.

  • - In May, 2008, he quit as the International Cricket Council’s cricket committee chairman to continue as an IPL TV commentator after the conflict of interest issue was raised.
  • - Eight years earlier, he was accused of ‘running with the hares and hunting with the hounds’ by the then National Cricket Academy chairman, Raj Singh Dungarpur after Gavaskar, in his column, questioned the NCA team being given a three-day game against the visiting Zimbabwe instead of a ‘more deserving’ set of players. As a member-advisor to the NCA, he was expected to back the trainees. He resigned.
  • - In 2006, he pushed for Mohinder Amarnath as India coach despite being in the panel which chose Greg Chappell.
  • - Happy to criticise, he never offered to take over as coach himself, where he would have been held accountable for the team’s failure or if there were fissures in the camp. He has done the job as a stop-gap though.
  • - In 2004, he was appointed batting consultant before the home series against Australia, to the discomfiture of coach John Wright who had to contend with a new power centre in the dressing room while airing his views on batting.


Tricky decisions
An NRI based in the UAE, Gavaskar will be at home as the first phase of the IPL is being played in the Gulf from April 16. But to resurrect the league’s standing, he may have to take strong decisions. And that could mean changing the COO, Sunder Raman, seen as Srinivasan’s man. Gavaskar was very much part of the IPL set up when the early controversies hit. He was in the governing council until 2010, a period when FERA allegations came up after the 2009 edition in South Africa.

The court is yet to take a call on a fresh probe, with the next hearing on April 16. Gavaskar’s position looks temporary, but it is a situation that would suit him.
 

SJS

Hall of Fame Member
Joy in the Srinivasn Camp !!

Quiet joy as Srinivasan expected to hold sway
Somshuvra Laha , Hindustan Times
Kolkata, March 29, 2014

As of now, there is a win-win feeling within the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) following the decisions taken by the Supreme Court on Friday.

By allowing Chennai Super Kings and Rajasthan Royals to participate in this season’s Indian Premier League, the Supreme Court has decided in favour of cricket, feel BCCI officials.

“I welcome today’s verdict. That the IPL will go on as per schedule is very good news for us. Moreover, the way the case has been going on, my feeling is N Srinivasan and MS Dhoni should come out unscathed,” IPL governing council member Subir Ganguly told HT.

The other decision to have Sunil Gavaskar as head of the BCCI only for IPL 7 right now means Srinivasan would be kept out of everything related to the T20 event. But it might not mean Srinivasan won’t be in the loop.
In charge

Officially, Ranjib Biswal is the IPL governing council chairman and is vested with the authority to convene meetings. On paper, Biswal is in charge of IPL affairs along with IPL COO, Sunder Raman, who looks after its day-to-day functioning.

But both, along with a few other governing council members, are reportedly close to Srinivasan, who used to make it a point to attend as many IPL governing council meetings as possible even though he wasn’t required to be present officially. According to sources, Srinivasan ensured he had the last say in most of the decisions regarding the IPL.

According to a BCCI official in the know of things, the present situation demands that Gavaskar should be placed above Biswal and Raman but it isn’t likely to change the power structure much. “Let’s put it this way. It’s a win-win situation for Srinivasan till the next hearing on April 16. Putting Gavaskar as head of BCCI for the IPL is a way to project the board’s intentions of seeking a clean image,” said the official, indicating that Srinivasan might still exercise some control indirectly.

The Supreme Court has left Gavaskar to decide whether Raman should continue as IPL CEO but according to the BCCI official, it is unlikely Raman would lose his job. “Who would do Raman’s job now? I don’t think Gavaskar will risk doing away with Raman with the IPL less than 20 days away. If at all, Gavaskar might seek his co-operation,” he said.

Overall it means that in making him step aside and not resign, not much is going to change in the functioning of the BCCI. With the fear of him returning to assume power, Srinivasan’s influence will continue in every sphere of its function. All the members are likely to consider his views before making any decision.

As for Srinivasan’s return to power, it hinges on the new investigation that the Supreme Court orders into the allegations. The India Cements boss has so far been expressing confidence of getting a clean chit on the basis that he has not done anything and he cannot be punished for his son-in-law Gurunath Meiyyapan’s conduct.
 

Athlai

Not Terrible
I think he just got along with our commentary team and was enjoying his time here more than anything though.
 

Dan

Hall of Fame Member
Greater density of KW fans than in India. Finally the people understood his love of the adorable future captain.
 

social

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I thought people were joking when they said Shastri and Gavaskar were BCCI puppets

500k p.a. goes a long way towards explaining some of the drivel they come out with
 

Top