• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Osman Samiuddin

Precambrian

Banned
The Airplane
Self-explanatory. Where the bowler runs, arms outstretched like wings, towards fielders. Popular with Shoaib Akhtar, and Chaminda Vaas in his prime.

The "You-can't-see-me"
Favoured by Fidel Edwards, Corey Collymore and other West Indians, who wave their hands in front of their faces in a Chinese-fan motion. Clearly they've watched plenty of the WWE, where John Cena patented the move.

The Assumption
Pioneered by Glenn McGrath, this consists of celebrating an lbw verdict before the umpire has actually given one. In fact, McGrath used to run on without even looking back at the umpire. Once a fine bluff, it can now lead to punishment.

The Hair-Ruffle
An Aussie thing, where the wicket-taking bowler has his hair very deliberately mussed up by almost every member of the side - whether he has hair or not. Probably designed to promote mateship or some such. Has been aped occasionally and feebly by India.

The Sajda
Preferred by Pakistan's mostly Muslim team, this is a religious ritual that became popular under Inzamam-ul-Haq: After scoring a hundred, the batsman kneels and touches his forehead to the ground. Before he became Muslim, Yousuf Youhana, Christian then, used to cross himself when he reached hundred - as Matthew Hayden still occasionally does when he gets to a landmark.

The Helmet Kiss
Pioneered by Michael Slater, who upon reaching his first Test hundred kissed the coat of arms on his helmet as if it were Kylie Minogue. Now a popularly accepted form of celebration, best executed by Kevin Pietersen, whose helmet-kissing should come with parental warnings.

The Retort Stemming from a desire to really stick it to someone.
Most memorably it came from Nasser Hussain in 2002 at Lord's. He got to an ODI hundred from one-down, and to his many critics in the media, pointed to the name on his back and then put up two fingers… or was it three? Sourav Ganguly's striptease at the end of the same match also qualifies.

The Family Man
Ricky Ponting made this one famous, blowing a kiss to his wife after adouble- hundred against India in 2003-04. Not as popular as expected since it first appeared, but sends out all the right messages, and no doubt will become more popular.

The Lawnmower
Brett Lee often pretends after taking a wicket that he needs to cut some grass. Duly he goes through the motions of pulling the ignition cord to rev up something that exists in his head. Sreesanth has taken to imitating the move in recent times.

The Chris Gayle
This could be anything, as long as it is delivered by Gayle with that sleepy, expressionless face: a slow windmilling of the arms, the forearm to the forehead in mock despair (as practiced by Ronaldo, the footballer) or just the ol' one-step, two-step jig.

The Chicken Dance
Ireland's giant-killing run in the 2007 World Cup regularly featured the sight of their players launching into a striking routine, where they flapped their arms like chickens. Shoaib has been known to perform a variant, usually when Pietersen is around.
Superb.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Yeah, have been a fan of Osman for a good 3 years or so now. Whenever it was that he started writing for CricInfo.

Agreed with Corey that this is no major breakthrough, however.
 

Xuhaib

International Coach
Osman was my neioughbour, a decent cricketer and also a very nice guy to have a convo with on any topic.
 

Precambrian

Banned
Pakistan can rightly feel aggrieved and unwanted. That sense will not be lessened by the realisation that the security situation in both countries is different enough to perhaps warrant different responses. At least it is very much seen to be different: the Mumbai attacks rightly leave India a victim of terror, but suicide attacks in Pakistan leave it a victimless hub of terror. There is truth to the perception, though Pakistani victims are plentiful, and to deny the problem in Pakistan is blind and dangerous. But details are missed: that cricket hasn't been targeted and that attacks have mostly hit state and military targets. Ultimately it hardly matters, for a bomb in India will do the same as a bomb in Pakistan.
The only rational way of avoiding this discrepancy, to eliminate as much doubt, is for the ICC to appoint one security firm approved by all its members, which would make all future security assessments. To ensure that the method of assessing risk is standard, or less ad-hoc than it is now, won't stop tour cancellations. But it might erode suspicions of double standards, heal some of cricket's rifts, and leave affected members with little scope for complaint. In this strange, shapeless war, that will be a little battle won.
Stand out paragraphs for me.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
I just hope someone from I$C$C reads these sort of articles. The stuff Osman suggests there is the sort of basic non-controversial common-sense that people in charge of cricket should be doing and the watching crowd should be taking for granted.
 

Sanz

Hall of Fame Member
Osman is a good writer, perhaps the best. But he is forgetting that in India's case it was the English Players themselves that wanted the tour to continue, in Pakistan's case they did not. ECB can not be accused of double standards if the players didn't want to go.

We can all have our opinion about safety issues in Pakistan/India and argue that the threat levels are same but it is the players who need to be convinced. I may be accused of beating the same drum, but Osman should be raising the question to the leaders of his country instead of accusing others of Double Standards.

After Mumbai attack, there was an outrage in India, against the government, there were heads that rolled, even if some may argue that it was more symbolic, but what happens in Pakistan when such attacks happen ? How many people got fired when the Marriott was blown up by terrorists ? Have they identified the Terrorists that blew up Marriott ? Have they caught the terrorists yet, If so what action has been taken yet ? It has been almost a year since Ms. Bhutto's assassination, have they caught anyone yet ?

So Osman should check with his government for their inactions before calling on ECB and ICC. It is time He accepted the fact that there is a 'Problem', attitude like 'Terrorism is not going anywhere soon. Similar situations are likely to arise again' is defeatist and sounds like an accepted part of his life. Unfortunately is not so for many others.
 

Sanz

Hall of Fame Member
Stand out paragraphs for me.
Easier said than done. Unless this so called 'Global Security Firm' starts giving out security assessments in favor of the nations like Pakistan, India, SL, It will be just a matter of time before such a committee is rejected as biased and incompetent.

Take a look at the ICC umpires and Match Refs, who are appointed by the ICC members themselves but pretty much every series we hear the murmurs of bias and racism.
 

Precambrian

Banned
Easier said than done. Unless this so called 'Global Security Firm' starts giving out security assessments in favor of the nations like Pakistan, India, SL, It will be just a matter of time before such a committee is rejected as biased and incompetent.

Take a look at the ICC umpires and Match Refs, who are appointed by the ICC members themselves but pretty much every series we hear the murmurs of bias and racism.
Surely a step towards the right direction. That's why it is insisted that an agency whose findings are acceptable by all. Consensus will be difficult but not impossible. And anyway better than the current situation where PCB literally have no say, and decisions are taken unilaterally.
 

Fusion

Global Moderator
While I would agree that there is a lack of accountability in Pakistan over inteligence failures, there is a big difference in the Mumbai attacks and Pakistani attacks. The Pakistani attacks on Marriot, Bhutto etc have been suicide bombings. Hence no chance of catching anyone. In the case of Mumbai, the police were actually able to catch a terrorist alive, hence they will be able to extract information out of him.
 

Sanz

Hall of Fame Member
Surely a step towards the right direction. That's why it is insisted that an agency whose findings are acceptable by all. Consensus will be difficult but not impossible. And anyway better than the current situation where PCB literally have no say, and decisions are taken unilaterally.
PCB will still have no say. What Osman is suggesting does not make sense. If a player does not feel safe enough to go and play in country 'A', he will not go no matter what the security team suggests. His board can not force him.

Secondly, It is more likely that that this 'Global Security Firm' will advise them to do the same ( i.e. India safer compared to Pakistan) and then we will have to go through the 'What about Pakistan 2' from Osman.
 

Top