• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Australian Spinner?

Who do you think will be Australia's frontline spiner over the next year or so?


  • Total voters
    27

Rant0r

International 12th Man
is is just me or if bryce mcgain the highest rated 37 year old with no tests to his name ever ?

and jason krejza is the most criticised player to have taken 10 or more wickets in a (most likely losing) test match
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Na, piss off. Was a better selection at the time of his selection than Krejza was.

Having said that, Krejza has earned another gig although I agree with PEWS as per usual.
Krejza's selection, as Robert has said, made some amount of sense on pitches like this. Krejza, apparently, has been for a while a bowler who can sometimes bowl really well on a turner but will often bowl very poorly.

Casson was basically selected for a Test tour on the back of 3-and-a-half good games or something, when the rest of his First-Class career has been woefulness personnified.

If Casson was the only spin option, four seamers should have been chosen. It's not like the pitch for that Test was crying-out for someone to bowl spin.
 

Durham_CCC

School Boy/Girl Captain
Kreja has looked very good at times during the 4th test. Maybe someone like Warne could give him tips how to keep his runs down.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Holding a half-decent length would do it.
I'm actually not sure about that. His consistency in length is pretty poor indeed (he actually keeps a pretty good line) but he got hit a lot in this game even when he hit perfectly good areas. His lack of variation makes him pretty easy to hit - you can bank on the flighted off break virtually every ball and really set yourself. As long as it doesn't turn appreciably more than you expected and he doesn't have anyone set for the shot out at deep midwicket, you can slog sweep a lot of his "good" balls. Obviously you need to be a good player of the shot, but he's not going to have you undone by the arm ball or the top spinner as he doesn't really possess those balls.

The mere threat of something different would reduce his economy rate quite a bit for mine, particularly on non-turning pitches where he plays most of his cricket. Not having to bowl his first few overs to Sehwag would help too.
 

four_or_six

Cricketer Of The Year
I think if Watson plays, you can afford to have Krejza as someone who is a bit expensive but might take a couple of wickets. I'm not sure if that holds for Symonds or not.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
I think if Watson plays, you can afford to have Krejza as someone who is a bit expensive but might take a couple of wickets. I'm not sure if that holds for Symonds or not.
The thing is though, I don't know if Krejza would take a couple of wickets in Australian conditions. I'm a massive fan of the bloke but he's not going to get much from Australian pitches. This is a slight on the pitches more than the bowler as I think he's good for cricket and we should be trying to get more like him into the game, but unless it's the fifth day he's not going to get any turn, and without turn he's just a punching bag.
 

four_or_six

Cricketer Of The Year
The thing is though, I don't know if Krejza would take a couple of wickets in Australian conditions. I'm a massive fan of the bloke but he's not going to get much from Australian pitches. This is a slight on the pitches more than the bowler as I think he's good for cricket and we should be trying to get more like him into the game, but unless it's the fifth day he's not going to get any turn, and without turn he's just a punching bag.
Well true, and they could play five quicks in Brisbane... but I think it would need to be someone a bit different like Bracken, and he's obviously ootq as he's injured.

If Symonds plays, it's a totally different question.
 

James90

Cricketer Of The Year
Krejza's selection, as Robert has said, made some amount of sense on pitches like this. Krejza, apparently, has been for a while a bowler who can sometimes bowl really well on a turner but will often bowl very poorly.

Casson was basically selected for a Test tour on the back of 3-and-a-half good games or something, when the rest of his First-Class career has been woefulness personnified.

If Casson was the only spin option, four seamers should have been chosen. It's not like the pitch for that Test was crying-out for someone to bowl spin.
Firstly, it was a dead rubber and the retirement of MacGill meant it was the last opportunity to blood a spinner before the Indian tour.

Secondly, he was taken over as back-up to MacGill and was bowling as well as anyone else at the time of his selection and thus got over the line on the basis of his batting. The fact that he was picked ahead of Brad Hogg for several Pura Cup games while at WA also suggests that his first-class career wasn't always completely woeful.

I'm think Cribbage's brilliant analysis should shut me up though. He's clearly identified Krejza's credentials much better than I have and they've turned out to be pretty accurate. IIRC there was talk that he was almost picked for the last tour of India in 2004ish when Gilchrist was captain, before he'd even played for NSW.

For the record I would have taken Casson over before either of White or Krejza.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Firstly, it was a dead rubber and the retirement of MacGill meant it was the last opportunity to blood a spinner before the Indian tour.

Secondly, he was taken over as back-up to MacGill and was bowling as well as anyone else at the time of his selection and thus got over the line on the basis of his batting. The fact that he was picked ahead of Brad Hogg for several Pura Cup games while at WA also suggests that his first-class career wasn't always completely woeful.
Hogg hasn't exactly had enormous success in the longer game anyway, has he?

I realise he was taken as second-choice to MacGill, but even if no-one foresaw MacGill retiring mid-series there was always a possibility of injury like with Warne in 2004/05 when Hauritz got to play, and he's even worse than Casson or Krejza.

Casson did not come close to deserving selection. Four seamers would've been far better.
 

pup11

International Coach
Hogg hasn't exactly had enormous success in the longer game anyway, has he?

I realise he was taken as second-choice to MacGill, but even if no-one foresaw MacGill retiring mid-series there was always a possibility of injury like with Warne in 2004/05 when Hauritz got to play, and he's even worse than Casson or Krejza.

Casson did not come close to deserving selection. Four seamers would've been far better.
As you have clearly yourself endorsed time and again that finger spinners are not effective on all surfaces, therefore its clear despite Krejza' success in the current test, he would struggle on tracks that don't offer him any assistance, so finding a serviceble wrist spinner was important for the Aussie selectors and out of all the availiable options in Australia atm, Casson is the best of the lot after Bryce McGain and that is why he was there in the Caribbean, yeah Casson is hardly a bowler (atm) who would strike fear into the hearts of the batsmen, but still he has some skill that can be worked on.

As far as playing four seamers is concerned, Australia weren't able to win the 2nd test in West Indies on the back of their seam attack, and then lack of variety in the attack, over-rates, these are all problems that come along with an all pace attack, and its not as if Casson was horrible or anything in that test, despite being hit around he bowled well and took crucial wickets in the second innings.
 

quick4mindia

School Boy/Girl Captain
My vote goes to Ricky Ponting aka Punter..He may like to work on his bowling ...to become the next frontline spinner of Australia...After display of his captaincy abilities in Nagpur. I was comparing the Nagpur event with what Dravid did last year in england. Dravid lost his captaincy largely due to the goof ups in decision making on and off the ground. Ponting who was until now saved by likes of Mcgrath and Warne is now exposed. Likes of Mcgrath and Warne were able to coverup stupidity of highest magnitude. But now Ponting is not going to be so lucky. Australian bowling is in a complete disarray and looks quite ordinary. They still have good batsmen but most of them are on the wrong side of thirties and CA will have to do a lot of work to get things in shape.
I think the time is not far away when cricketing authorities in Australia will have to rethink on continuing with Ponting as Captain.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
As you have clearly yourself endorsed time and again that finger spinners are not effective on all surfaces, therefore its clear despite Krejza' success in the current test, he would struggle on tracks that don't offer him any assistance, so finding a serviceble wrist spinner was important for the Aussie selectors and out of all the availiable options in Australia atm, Casson is the best of the lot after Bryce McGain and that is why he was there in the Caribbean, yeah Casson is hardly a bowler (atm) who would strike fear into the hearts of the batsmen, but still he has some skill that can be worked on.

As far as playing four seamers is concerned, Australia weren't able to win the 2nd test in West Indies on the back of their seam attack, and then lack of variety in the attack, over-rates, these are all problems that come along with an all pace attack, and its not as if Casson was horrible or anything in that test, despite being hit around he bowled well and took crucial wickets in the second innings.
He got Marshall out with an attempted flick which was inside-edged, and I forget how the other top-order batsman, think it was Bravo, he got out fell.

Casson bowled dreadfully that match for mine, and I wasn't at all surprised that he did such a thing.

Just because fingerspinners are unlikely to prove much use to Australia doesn't mean they are well-served to be picking a wristspinner whose control and speed are extremely poor.

You just don't get "serviceable wristspinners", really. A standard wristspinner (ie not someone like Kumble) is generally either very poor, not even First-Class standard (like Casson and Doran for example) or exceptional (like Warne and Murali). You hardly ever get in-the-middle types like MacGill.
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Can't be Cameron White, obviously.

Bloke rang the radio this morning questioning his selection. Said "He couldn't hit an elephant in the arse with a handful of rice".

Gold.
 

Top