Cevno
Hall of Fame Member
You make the same rhetorical argument everytime and expect me to ask a different question every time?
You make the same rhetorical argument everytime and expect me to ask a different question every time?
If Harbhajan actually did call Symonds maa ki, then yeah, there is similarity. Though that would have been a case of being misheard, if true.A bit similar to harbhajan calling him maa ki or monkey ,don't you think?
Very trueAnd i do not believe you have understood my post.
If Harbhajan actually did call Symonds maa ki, then yeah, there is similarity. Though that would have been a case of being misheard, if true.
If he called him monkey though, not similar at all. If he used the term monkey, he was in my view simply deliberately picking the term he thought would most get under Symonds' skin and using it. I see absolutely nothing to suggest that if Harbhajan used the word monkey he was referring to Lord Hanuman or whatever his name is.
I've said this all along - I don't think Harbhajan meant "inferior black man" with the monkey term directed at Symonds. I do, however, imagine he knew that it would annoy Symonds and I do think it was as poor form on his part as whatever it was Symonds and co were doing to antagonise him ITFP.IF you do not care about Indian culture "Lord hanuman or whatever his name his",Then how can you expect Indians to care about whatever ethnicity symonds belongs too or whatever its history is?
I do not think it occured to harbhajan to as to what he was doing,and nor did he mean it in a racist way.It was just a quick retort if indeed it was "monkey" ,which he realised afterwards like symonds should with what he has published for worldwide reading unlike in a one to one conversation?
That's what makes this thread so beautiful. In 60+ posts we have all been saying the exact same thing, nobody has changed their argument and nobody has changed anybody's mind.You make the same rhetorical argument everytime and expect me to ask a different question every time?
Lilian Thomson did shed a bit of light with his post I thoughtThat's what makes this thread so beautiful. In 60+ posts we have all been saying the exact same thing, nobody has changed their argument and nobody has changed anybody's mind.
Fair enough point...Lilian Thomson did shed a bit of light with his post I thought
Atleast it has not descended to name calling,and gone off the topic as most threads here do on controversial topics.That's what makes this thread so beautiful. In 60+ posts we have all been saying the exact same thing, nobody has changed their argument and nobody has changed anybody's mind.
Haha.And somebody should sue him.