Rubbish. Post-colonial bluster, the same bull**** Jagmohan Dalmiya, Lalit Modi and the likes have been coming-out with for the last decade.
The ECB never, ever ran the global game. Nor did its predecessor, the TCCB. The game was run by MCC, which ceased to run the game in the UK in 1968 - when the TCCB was formed.
Nor are the ECB the only ones who'd benefit from an Asian-bloc split. As I say, it may appear productive at the current time for the PCB and BCCSL to side with India over everything but at the end of the day they are merely prostituting themselves to India, which benefits no-one.
Cricket is best-served if all global parties have an equal share and power-base. The ECB never have and never will run the game; nor will the game ever again be run by those whose majority interests centre on the British Isles. Equally it's fanciful to suggest that there will ever be a time when all parties are truly equal - the likes of New Zealand and South Africa are severely limited by the weakness of their own currency and their lack of numbers viewing, neither of which they have any power to change.
However, the current skew which means India, basically, runs the show benefits no-one other than India at the end of the day. In the long-term, it's highly questionable that it'll even benefit India, as resentment runs deep and stays in the system for a long time. The fact that people still come out with the post-colonial bull**** they do shows how much long-term damage has been done by the perception (rightly or wrongly, presmably far more of the former) that for a century the game was run in the interests of England, even if the World govorning body wasn't actually the same as the govorning body over here.