was it a month?LOL I wasn't taking the piss, mine came from a bet with dav
Right, you're my guide. How long do we have to go?
geez, it seems like 2 months alreadyA week
Actually, I just looked at which answer you nominated...you can also discuss Lamb Kofta here if you like.You know when you put it up, not me!
If it's typically English, then that's good. The future is just that - the future. Your vision for the future has zero place in your selections of the current Test side. Trying to plan for the future is done in other areas.I was talking more about England results since 2005...not Ramprakash himself.
If he averages 60 then obviously that'd be a good thing. Although I'd still be a bit concerned about where you were going after that. It kind of hints that there's no vision for the future...the part which I was attempting to indicate was typically English.
I don't actually like it BTW, don't even know what it is - though I presume it's meat, in which case I actually picked it because I thought it read something like "I like Allan Lamb". Which would be true, though I never saw a match in which he played live some of his attacks on West Indian seam-bowlers over his career - and a few other innings to boot - were legendary. And even to look back on them is fairly awesome viewing.Actually, I just looked at which answer you nominated...you can also discuss Lamb Kofta here if you like.
Are you a vego Rich?
I eats no meats if that's what you means.Are you a vego Rich?
Obviously, given recent results.If it's typically English, then that's good. The future is just that - the future. Your vision for the future has zero place in your selections of the current Test side. Trying to plan for the future is done in other areas.
He did a good job of taking 22 off a Bruce Reid over to win a one-dayer if memory serves me correctly.I don't actually like it BTW, don't even know what it is - though I presume it's meat, in which case I actually picked it because I thought it read something like "I like Allan Lamb". Which would be true, though I never saw a match in which he played live some of his attacks on West Indian seam-bowlers over his career - and a few other innings to boot - were legendary. And even to look back on them is fairly awesome viewing.
Recent results (ie, the last 2 or 3 years) have been borne more than anything else of just the problem I mentioned - trying to merge planning the future with the best interests of the Test side.Obviously, given recent results.
18, actually. But he only needed 5 balls to hit them: 2-4-6-2-4. Not at all shabby anyway & still the most runs off a final over to win, I think. Bit of help from Wellham's arm & Reid's catching tho.He did a good job of taking 22 off a Bruce Reid over to win a one-dayer if memory serves me correctly.