About as irrelevant as they come to this question really. So he was the best choice I could think of answering the question I was.Why?
So enlighten us then . Who is the best keeper in the Country?There's almost no way James Foster's the best wicketkeeper in the country. He can certainly bat, too.
Read and Batty are at the very least as good. You'd have to have watched an awful lot of the domestic game, at First-Class level, to know whether most of the other lot (Pipe, for instance) are better or worse, too.
Well I'd say we know that yours are poor. There's really no use you responding to any of my posts, at all, in fact.We already know from a previous post that your appreciation of wicketkeeping skills is zero, so it's not really worth debating any further.
There's really no use you responding to any of my posts, at all, in fact.
tbh this lilian thompson character does for CW what the yorkshire ripper did for door to door salesmen.
Now now friends let's keep that out of the forum...Next time I see Mrs Leach I'll pass that one on, I'm sure she'll be relieved to know that her daughter's murder has resulted in such side splitting humour.
Now now friends let's keep that out of the forum...
Nixon was a good choice, he had a good WC, one of very few England players who can actually say that.Nixon was a poor choice amongst poor options. English selections are flushed with conservatism. The fact you had to dig up a 36 year old who was decidedly average shows there's something drastically wrong somewhere. Alec Stewart probably would have been a better choice if you were determined to 'go old'
Virtually no good wicketkeeper batsmen? I think there's a few.
Not a wicketkeeper. Try Gareth Cross.List of Pommie Wicket-keepers by county
...
Lancashire: Luke Sutton (BA-32), Paul Horton (BA-45)
To be fair Ambrose isn't not Australian....And Jones is an Aussie.
I'd disagree there. Nixon may well have been the best option, but a coupla months before the only ODI tournament that really matters an arse isn't the time to be introducing an uncapped 36-year-old. It was a tacit admission that all of our selectors' "planning" over the preceeding 4 years had amounted to squat. If Nixon was the best option he should've been picked long before.The fact Nixon played doesn't show there's anything wrong anywhere. He was a good choice among poor options. It's no fault, nor anything to do with selectorial conservativism, that there aren't many good one-day batsmen in England, never mind those who can also keep wicket. It's just the way things are. Selectors can do no more than make the best of what is available. Nixon was the best option at that point in time. No more, no less. If there are so many good one-day wicketkeeper-batsmen, name 'em. Rather than just making assumptions. Most wicketkeeper-batsmen in this country average in the low 20s or even the teens in the one-day game. Read is the only one who's ever made any impression, and he'd just looked unutterably clueless in the Champions Trophy.
Pothas is qualified now I think. I'm pretty sure he took out UK citizenship about a year ago & debuted for Hants in 2002. Nothwithstanding the fact that he's 34 & a Greek Saffie, he's possibly still the best option if we were selecting without an eye on the future.List of Pommie Wicket-keepers by county
Hampshire: Tom Burrows (BA-23), Nic Pothas (BA-40[Possibility after qualification?])
Yorkshire: Simon Guy (BA-16), Gerard Brophy (BA-32 [Chance once qualified?])
Was a lorry driver to be fair.tbh this lilian thompson character does for CW what the yorkshire ripper did for door to door salesmen.