Neil Pickup
Cricket Web Moderator
I was tempted to reply first up with "Swervy to be accused of Englishness in 5..4..3.." but opted to wait for the obvious to occur.Swervy said:I am Australian you dong
I was tempted to reply first up with "Swervy to be accused of Englishness in 5..4..3.." but opted to wait for the obvious to occur.Swervy said:I am Australian you dong
only 5 miles from Lancs thoughsteds said:So THAT'S why you live in Yorkshire...
whereabouts are you then?superkingdave said:an i live only about 2 miles from Yorkshire, but its a world away
OldhamSwervy said:whereabouts are you then?
lovely..with Saddleworth Moor looking over you back garden thensuperkingdave said:Oldham
No..Swervy said:hehehe..c'mon Mr L, you know Flintoff is a better allrounder than Kallis
Good post.Langeveldt said:No..
Flintoff is a better bowler than Kallis
Kallis is a better batsman than Flintoff
Both superb fielders..
That equals zero...
So there is no "eating of dust" involved, thank you for your time...
Yes but Flintoff actually bowls... Kallis barely ever turns his arm over anymore.Langeveldt said:No..
Flintoff is a better bowler than Kallis
Kallis is a better batsman than Flintoff
Both superb fielders..
That equals zero...
So there is no "eating of dust" involved, thank you for your time...
ok...Brett Lee is a better bowler than KallisLangeveldt said:No..
Flintoff is a better bowler than Kallis
Kallis is a better batsman than Flintoff
Both superb fielders..
That equals zero...
So there is no "eating of dust" involved, thank you for your time...
that makes bradman the best all rounder ever.Langeveldt said:No..
Flintoff is a better bowler than Kallis
Kallis is a better batsman than Flintoff
Both superb fielders..
That equals zero...
So there is no "eating of dust" involved, thank you for your time...
To quote Nibbs, lame.Shane Warne said:No I'm not, you're looking like a jumping the gun gloating winner, ignoring the fact that Australia's only decent seamer wasn't present to coincide with Flintoff slogging a few sixes.
Both. England's generally bowled better than Australia in this match. Both teams have played some rather ridiculous shots too. Hayden, Ponting, Warne are classic examples among the Aussies and Trescothick (twice!), Vaughan, Jones for England.cpr said:Either England have bowled well, or Australia have batted poorly.... either way McGrath being in the side wouldnt have affected either of them....
And if you add up their combined worth, it amounts to almost half of Mcgrath's.Mr Mxyzptlk said:So McGrath got injured - unfortunate. Half the England team was injured on the last Ashes tour...
So does that mean the India in Australia series didn't happen then?Shane Warne said:Flintoff got lucky because Mcgrath wasn't there and Gillespie is shot to pieces thesedays.
So it wasn't really V Australia. None of their other bowlers are any good except Warne.
How well did Flintoff do in the first test when Aus had their better bowling attack?
It happened, but was pretty meaningless.marc71178 said:So does that mean the India in Australia series didn't happen then?
Which therefore suggests Australia are a one man team...Shane Warne said:And if you add up their combined worth, it amounts to almost half of Mcgrath's.