membersstand
State Vice-Captain
From the other thread..
Give it 4 or 5 more tests and McGrath will have more wickets than Walsh, and they all had 400 plus. Surely a few wickets extra doesn't matter that much.shaka said:I voted for Walsh, although his batting could have been improved. 500 odd wickets has to put him over the top, plus bowling in tandem most times with Ambrose.
That's true to an extent with the ball, but more with the bat. McGrath has typically had more runs to play with, not that he gives any away...mavric41 said:Ambrose, ,just, because of the fear factor. Lets not forget McGrath has had wonderful support for most of his career to maintain the pressure.
Because McGrath and Ambrose were vastly superior bowlers until the very end of Walsh's career?Link said:McGrath for me, how has Walsh only deserved 4 votes so far...?