Hit4Six said:
should but wasnt...he went on to make the wonderful 98 so regardless of what SHOULD have happened his innings was great and not some 'pristine' 47
..karma did play a small role, 2 short of a century
It wasn't a catch, I mean he didn't drop it exactly
Here, cricinfo didn't even mention anything extraordinary abt it
End of over 8 (9 runs) India 67/2 (RR: 8.38 RRR: 207/42 = 4.93)
Waqar Younis 3-0-23-2 - Hennops River End
SR Tendulkar 42* (28b 5x4 1x6) M Kaif 0* (6b)
8.1 Wasim Akram to Tendulkar, FOUR, Goodness! a beauty of a backfoot
punch through cover
8.2 Wasim Akram to Tendulkar, (noball) no run, short and cut to point
8.2 Wasim Akram to Tendulkar, no run, on the off stump and its slammed
to Inzamam who fields it well at short point
8.3 Wasim Akram to Tendulkar, no run, short and defends it off to leg
8.4 Wasim Akram to Tendulkar, two runs, turned to mid wicket and only 2
more needed for a great odi fifty
8.5 Wasim Akram to Tendulkar, no run, beaten outside off, was a Wasim
special, statically driven and missed
8.6 Wasim Akram to Tendulkar, one run, off the backfoot, edges in the
air to backward point
By the way, how was it 47? He is 42, then 8.1 put him on 46, then he takes 2 runs at 8.4 which puts him on 48..am I mistaken or was this some other over?