|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Cricket Web Staff Member / Global Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Oxford, England
Posts: 26,361
|
21,333
Aggregate/overall records | One-Day Internationals | Cricinfo Statsguru | ESPN Cricinfo
Wonder what the odds of that were?
__________________
MSN Messenger: minardineil2000 at hotmail dot com | AAAS Chairman CricketWeb Black | CricketWeb XI Captain ClarkeWatch: We're Watching Rikki - Are You? Up The Grecians - Exeter City FC Completing the Square: My Cricket Web Blog |
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Hall of Fame Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: dxb
Posts: 18,862
|
wow..........
__________________
And smalishah's avatar is the most classy one by far Jan certainly echoes the sentiments of CW Yeah we don't crap in the first world; most of us would actually have no idea what that was emanating from Ajmal's backside. Why isn't it roses and rainbows like what happens here? PEWS's retort to Ganeshran on Daemon's picture depicting Ajmal's excreta |
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
International Coach
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Top floor, bottom buzzer
Posts: 13,881
|
Great find.
Quote:
Not much difference anyway. 1996 and 1987 still have the highest averages.
__________________
Maybe we wouldn't be so quick to fill buckets with filth if we knew they had a soul. Or maybe that's what they're into. Ain't no way to get inside a bucket's mind. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Cricket Web Staff Member / Global Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Oxford, England
Posts: 26,361
|
That only excludes minnow-v-minnow, though, and still includes, say, Australia v Canada.
I've had a play, too, and I can't figure out a way to exclude the latter. |
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
International Coach
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: India
Posts: 10,305
|
Quote:
EDIT : Or what Pickup said. EDIT EDIT : Wondering whether Bangladesh should be included, they have a couple of horrific batting performances in there. Bangladesh vs. WI and Bangladesh vs. SA must be bringing that average down a fair bit. Last edited by vcs; 03-04-2011 at 07:31 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | ||
|
International Coach
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Top floor, bottom buzzer
Posts: 13,881
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
International Coach
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: India
Posts: 10,305
|
OK, having had another look at that original filter Pickup posted, you can see a pretty marked increase in the RR. Though the average runs/wicket doesn't change much from previous WCs (in fact it goes down compared to '87 and '96, something that I found pretty surprising at first glance), the increased RR shows that teams are scoring more runs at a faster rate than ever before (better bats, Power Plays). There must have been quite a few 230/5 or 245/6 type 1st innings scores in those previous editions, which simply don't happen anymore.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|