Exactly, actually you can look at SA and Aus of the 1999 World cup. SA lost only 2 matches in the whole WC, Australia lost 3.Or the 1999 Australia, even though they were incredibly fortunate to get through that semi.
Played poorly in the early 2 or 3 games, but with one of those being against Scotland could afford to.
It shouldn't be forgotten, though, that Australia could have gone out of that tournament 3 times (and should twice - being saved only by a Gibbs dropped catch and a Klusener brain-failure).
Well it didn't favour it in that case... Klusener went for the run and misfortune smiled on him...Fortune favors the brave...by the way the klusner brain failure was actually Steve's brilliance
Damn you Richard! Damn you to hell!!Good players.
Trust you to over-analyse (and try to discredit) one of the most simplistic and often-used cliches in the history of sport, Richard.Yes, and I've never believed the presumption it is based on for a second.
IMO it's most accurate to say you don't get a champion team without champion players. Don't underestimate the negative impact a frictional undercurrent can have on a team of champions, but equally don't overestimate the positive impact that can be made on a group of average players by what's often referred to as "team spirit".
"Team spirit" for me was best summed-up by the guy who called it "the illusion of togetherness glimpsed in the aftermath of triumph" or something along those lines.
Indeed 'twas...Wasn't it Fleming who under-armed it to Gilchrist?
Remember him talking about how they had been ten pin bowling a few nights before, and just out of habit he rolled it along the floor all the way down to Gilchrist's end.
Always trust me on that one.Trust you to over-analyse (and try to discredit) one of the most simplistic and often-used cliches in the history of sport, Richard.