• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

What is the driving force of a World Champion team?

What is the driving force in a champion team

  • Team'potential

    Votes: 1 5.9%
  • Consistency

    Votes: 9 52.9%
  • The Captain

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • The road to the WC

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • The coach and managment

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Peaking at the right time (form)

    Votes: 7 41.2%
  • Good mix of youth and experience

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    17

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Or the 1999 Australia, even though they were incredibly fortunate to get through that semi.

Played poorly in the early 2 or 3 games, but with one of those being against Scotland could afford to.
 

rodzilla1010

U19 Cricketer
Or the 1999 Australia, even though they were incredibly fortunate to get through that semi.

Played poorly in the early 2 or 3 games, but with one of those being against Scotland could afford to.
Exactly, actually you can look at SA and Aus of the 1999 World cup. SA lost only 2 matches in the whole WC, Australia lost 3.
In 1992 NZ lost only 2 matches, Pakistan lost 3 games.

Actually Pakistan had to win 6 straight matches to win the cup
Australia famously won 7 consective.

So i think consistency takes a back seat, its to peak at the rigt time. I rather lose 3 games in the begining than losing one in the end
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
It shouldn't be forgotten, though, that Australia could have gone out of that tournament 3 times (and should twice - being saved only by a Gibbs dropped catch and a Klusener brain-failure).
 

rodzilla1010

U19 Cricketer
It shouldn't be forgotten, though, that Australia could have gone out of that tournament 3 times (and should twice - being saved only by a Gibbs dropped catch and a Klusener brain-failure).

Fortune favors the brave...by the way the klusner brain failure was actually Steve's brilliance
 

Neil Pickup

Cricket Web Moderator
Steve had mastered mind-control had he?

Actually, it would explain England picking Richard Dawson against them...
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Fortune favors the brave...by the way the klusner brain failure was actually Steve's brilliance
Well it didn't favour it in that case... Klusener went for the run and misfortune smiled on him...

How exactly did Stephen Waugh help with that? IIRR he didn't even touch the ball, it was Fleming, his twin and Gilchrist.
 
Last edited:

vic_orthdox

Global Moderator
Consistency. It creates a habit of winning, as well as a sense of trust and confidence in your own teammates, in addition to a belief that you can win from any position.
 

vic_orthdox

Global Moderator
Wasn't it Fleming who under-armed it to Gilchrist?

Remember him talking about how they had been ten pin bowling a few nights before, and just out of habit he rolled it along the floor all the way down to Gilchrist's end.
 

pup11

International Coach
Yeah it sure was a magical moment for every aussie cricketer and fan. Flem's under-arm throw was very sensible in that heat of the moment.
 

Fiery

Banned
Yes, and I've never believed the presumption it is based on for a second.

IMO it's most accurate to say you don't get a champion team without champion players. Don't underestimate the negative impact a frictional undercurrent can have on a team of champions, but equally don't overestimate the positive impact that can be made on a group of average players by what's often referred to as "team spirit".

"Team spirit" for me was best summed-up by the guy who called it "the illusion of togetherness glimpsed in the aftermath of triumph" or something along those lines.
:laugh: Trust you to over-analyse (and try to discredit) one of the most simplistic and often-used cliches in the history of sport, Richard. :happy:
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Wasn't it Fleming who under-armed it to Gilchrist?

Remember him talking about how they had been ten pin bowling a few nights before, and just out of habit he rolled it along the floor all the way down to Gilchrist's end.
Indeed 'twas...
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
:laugh: Trust you to over-analyse (and try to discredit) one of the most simplistic and often-used cliches in the history of sport, Richard. :happy:
Always trust me on that one.

There are a lot silly ones out there, you see. ;)
 

Top