• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Who's Done the Most Damage?

Most damage done against the player?


  • Total voters
    14

capt_Luffy

Hall of Fame Member
yes if all other factors equal (wicket competition, performance across conditions/countries), that matters more than a few average points.

I prefer the better wickettaker than the cheaper bowler.
Wicket competition and performance across conditions neither is even that close to equal. And again, 3 isn't just 3 points.
 

subshakerz

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Wicket competition and performance across conditions neither is even that close to equal. And again, 3 isn't just 3 points.
There isn't a big difference IMO. Ambrose has a lot more competition early career, much less later half career when his WPM went down. Ambrose doesn't have much outside Eng, Aus and WI to talk about.
 

capt_Luffy

Hall of Fame Member
There isn't a big difference IMO. Ambrose has a lot more competition early career, much less later half career when his WPM went down. Ambrose doesn't have much outside Eng, Aus and WI to talk about.
Lillee has no WI and his Home record is based on bashing ENG, trashy NZ and only really Great to WI in the most bounciest of pitches bowling alongside Thomson.
Tell me, who you rate higher Keith Miller or Wes Hall?
 

subshakerz

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Lillee has no WI and his Home record is based on bashing ENG, trashy NZ and only really Great to WI in the most bounciest of pitches bowling alongside Thomson.
Tell me, who you rate higher Keith Miller or Wes Hall?
Miller I guess. Not sure.

Anyways Lillee did pretty decent in WI in
WSC.

His home record is legit awesome. Especially compared to Ambrose. He delivered vs WI after Thommo too.

The Lillee hate here doesn't make sense.
 

capt_Luffy

Hall of Fame Member
Miller I guess. Not sure.

Anyways Lillee did pretty decent in WI in
WSC.

His home record is legit awesome. Especially compared to Ambrose. He delivered vs WI after Thommo too.
He averages 24 at Home with 2.75 WPI
Excluding a bad debut Series and one ill, Ambrose does 19 with 2.41 WPI. It isn't better let alone significantly. After Thommo he had one good Series vs WI and one extremely mid. His best was going for the head in some of the bounciest and fastest tracks ever. WSC wasn't Tests and even then his WI record doesn't come close to Ambrose in either of those 3 countries.
Miller has like 1 less WPM though
 

subshakerz

Request Your Custom Title Now!
He averages 24 at Home with 2.75 WPI
Excluding a bad debut Series and one ill, Ambrose does 19 with 2.41 WPI. It isn't better let alone significantly. After Thommo he had one good Series vs WI and one extremely mid. His best was going for the head in some of the bounciest and fastest tracks ever. WSC wasn't Tests and even then his WI record doesn't come close to Ambrose in either of those 3 countries.
Miller has like 1 less WPM though
Lillee averages 23 at home. With a SR of 49.

As for Ambrose at home, I don't believe in removing debut series from larger samples like that if we don't do it for other cricketers just to make their records look better.

Big picture, Ambrose outside Aus and Eng simply had issues taking wickets at the rate you would like for a top tier pacer.
 

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
He averages 24 at Home with 2.75 WPI
Excluding a bad debut Series and one ill, Ambrose does 19 with 2.41 WPI. It isn't better let alone significantly. After Thommo he had one good Series vs WI and one extremely mid. His best was going for the head in some of the bounciest and fastest tracks ever. WSC wasn't Tests and even then his WI record doesn't come close to Ambrose in either of those 3 countries.
Miller has like 1 less WPM though
yeah Lillee's home superiority is basically one bad home series for Ambrose in his debut, Lillee's home average never went down 22
 
Last edited:

capt_Luffy

Hall of Fame Member
Lillee averages 23 at home. With a SR of 49.

As for Ambrose at home, I don't believe in removing debut series from larger samples like that if we don't do it for other cricketers just to make their records look better.

Big picture, Ambrose outside Aus and Eng simply had issues taking wickets at the rate you would like for a top tier pacer.
Lillee also had that problem everywhere but ENG and AUS, and even in Australia he did so at quite a handsome Average. Like I thought it was on quality, in which case one particular Series being debut can definitely be overlooked. And that's mostly for WPI, Ambrose has nonetheless a much better average at home.
 

kyear2

Hall of Fame Member
Yeah Imran to me is more proven given success in SC, WI, Eng and Aus.
Where was he proven in the SC away from helpful umpires at home?

There was home, minnow SL and India and he wasn't proven in India. His overall record in Australia isn't exactly standout either.
 

Top