Pretty much everything I wanted to say.For me it's between Sobers and Viv. I go back and forth. Sobers is statistically well ahead overall but then again he had his issues with NZ and probably played weaker attacks more often. Viv was consistent across teams and countries but did have his greatness probably concentrated in a shorter period. Decisions......
why do you have Lara over Sobers?Lara for me
Faced better bowling quality on tougher wickets and batted at no 3/4.why do you have Lara over Sobers?
Viv clearly not even in the chat PCRPI of them
Lara : 51.5
Sobers: 50.2
Viv : 46.9
Headley : 54.75
Lara's ARG was flatter than any wicket Sobers played on, and Sobers was more dominant against ATG pacers than Lara anyway.Faced better bowling quality on tougher wickets and batted at no 3/4.
Lara has to bat in an extremely weak line up while Sobers hid behind one of the strongest batting lineups.Lara's ARG was flatter than any wicket Sobers played on, and Sobers was more dominant against ATG pacers than Lara anyway.
Sobers averages 67 at 3 and 4 so Lara should be happy Sobers decided to play MO or no?Lara has to bat in an extremely weak line up while Sobers hid behind one of the strongest batting lineups.
Only played there when the pitch was flat thoSobers averages 67 at 3 and 4 so Lara should be happy Sobers decided to play MO or no?
Sabina Park 1960Only played there when the pitch was flat tho
Just one inningsSabina Park 1960
So is Headley the greatest based on RPI?Viv clearly not even in the chat PC