• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Which cricketers go on each countries Mount Rushmore?

subshakerz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Cricket was always massively popular in England. And Yes, while celebration is important, the actual influence and impact on English Cricket is well more important to me for the English mount rushmore, and Hutton blows beefy away in that regard. Like I said, Worrell – Lara.
No but cricket always stayed in it's own domain until Botham. He became a cultural icon of the entire country. He took cricket popularity to the next level. It's nuts to exclude him.
 

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
No but cricket always stayed in it's own domain until Botham. He became a cultural icon of the entire country. He took cricket popularity to the next level. It's nuts to exclude him.
Yeah but he faded away and we returned to the mean very soon.
 

sayon basak

International Coach
Birth is Hanif.

Growth and Development are Imran and Miandad jointly.

Preservation is Wasim who kept the torch going from Imran keeping Pakistan competitive.

Pretty straightforward
If Fazal is not in there, it probably should be thrown into the bin.

Pretty straightforward.
 

capt_Luffy

Hall of Fame Member
Birth is Hanif.

Growth and Development are Imran and Miandad jointly.

Preservation is Wasim who kept the torch going from Imran keeping Pakistan competitive.

Pretty straightforward
Don't know of this chief. Imran is senior to Miandad and can't see a scenario for Miandad to represent Growth rather than Imran.
 

subshakerz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Sure, by that logic Dhoni should be on Indian mount rushmore and not Pataudi, Mankad or Hazare or anyone before Gavaskar really, doesn't make sense.
Kohli is bigger than Dhoni.

I may be tempted to not put Kapil frankly in favor of one of the early era cricketers.

Pataudi, Gavaskar, Sachin, Kohli.

Actually it's a good question, who is the godfather of modern Indian cricket, Kapil or Gavaskar?
 

capt_Luffy

Hall of Fame Member
Huh? It's the opposite. Development happens after growth.
Whichever way you put it, both kinda synonymous in this context. Bottomline, Miandad got there when Pak wasn't ****, so he can only compete for the growth spot, with Imran...... So yeah. And while I generally don't mix cricket with cricketers outside of it, being involved so closely with terrorism kinda leaves an extremely bad taste in terms of Greatness
 

Top