shortpitched713
Cricketer Of The Year
Hesitant on this construction, as I feel it's likely to split the West Indian vote, but this is the best and closest order of middle order batsmen spanning these eras I could think of.
please, you and Coronis (read: no WIers) are the only two posters who will be confused about what to do between Viv and Weekes. At least if you're making polls have it be a close one, ignoring that you think Weekes and Barrington are massively underrated because it means the rest of CW – doesn't.I feel it's likely to split the West Indian vote
Actually I only think Weekes of these 3 is super underrated. Just wanted to see where the Viv / Barrington comparison fits in alongside it, and get a sense for how people rate the different eras as well.please, you and Coronis (read: no WIers) are the only two posters who will be confused about what to do between Viv and Weekes. At least if you're making polls have it be a close one, ignoring that you think Weekes and Barrington are massively underrated because it means the rest of CW – doesn't.
What Viv / Barrington comparison? This is not a thing that exists! There is no comparison, it is dead void null zero.the Viv / Barrington comparison
I feel like you got this hostile vibe, and all I did is roll eyes at you one time. Chill ataraxia, let's make peace.please, you and Coronis (read: no WIers) are the only two posters who will be confused about what to do between Viv and Weekes. At least if you're making polls have it be a close one, ignoring that you think Weekes and Barrington are massively underrated because it means the rest of CW – doesn't.
lol. I have never said anything about Richards being inferior or hell even close to Weekes. He is easily top 3 Windies batsman of all time. I don’t even think ranking him 3rd (as I do) is that controversial, as most people would have Sobers/Lara/Viv in their top 10 bats of all time.please, you and Coronis (read: no WIers) are the only two posters who will be confused about what to do between Viv and Weekes. At least if you're making polls have it be a close one, ignoring that you think Weekes and Barrington are massively underrated because it means the rest of CW – doesn't.
NahBarrington > Viv > Weekes
Yah
Yeah. It's a lazy assumption based on his record against Australia.Barrington being a dominant force against great attacks and levelling up in tests is partly a myth too. He failed against WI who were arguably the strongest side of the era.
His record is relatively subpar against them I agree.Barrington being a dominant force against great attacks and levelling up in tests is partly a myth too. He failed against WI who were arguably the strongest side of the era.
Well, this Barrington fellow did score quite a few runs. And at least 6 people on the forum believe that he was a greater Test batsman than Weekes.This is an insult to Viv and Weekes.
How is it a insult to rank behind someone who averaged near 60 in test cricket and near 70 away from home?This is an insult to Viv and Weekes.
Cos he didn’t have a 60 SR. What a loserHow is it a insult to rank behind someone who averaged near 60 in test cricket and near 70 away from home?