• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Weekes v Barrington v Viv Richards (rank in order)

Rank in order as greater Test batsmen

  • Weekes > Barrington > V. Richards

  • Weekes > V. Richards > Barrington

  • Barrington > Weekes > V. Richards

  • V. Richards > Weekes > Barrington

  • Barrington > V. Richards > Weekes

  • V. Richards > Barrington > Weekes


Results are only viewable after voting.

shortpitched713

Cricketer Of The Year
Hesitant on this construction, as I feel it's likely to split the West Indian vote, but this is the best and closest order of middle order batsmen spanning these eras I could think of.
 

ataraxia

International Coach
I feel it's likely to split the West Indian vote
please, you and Coronis (read: no WIers) are the only two posters who will be confused about what to do between Viv and Weekes. At least if you're making polls have it be a close one, ignoring that you think Weekes and Barrington are massively underrated because it means the rest of CW – doesn't.
 

shortpitched713

Cricketer Of The Year
Sobers intersected Weekes, and did play in the same year ( but never together, with Viv ). I think including Sobers in any construction would have been too one sided, as he seems to be one of the 3 consensus BBB picks alongside Tendulkar and Hobbs.
 

ataraxia

International Coach
Well done on picking the opposite of the likely winner (though I suspect with this early lead Weekes may well prevail over Barrington).
 

shortpitched713

Cricketer Of The Year
please, you and Coronis (read: no WIers) are the only two posters who will be confused about what to do between Viv and Weekes. At least if you're making polls have it be a close one, ignoring that you think Weekes and Barrington are massively underrated because it means the rest of CW – doesn't.
Actually I only think Weekes of these 3 is super underrated. Just wanted to see where the Viv / Barrington comparison fits in alongside it, and get a sense for how people rate the different eras as well.
 

shortpitched713

Cricketer Of The Year
please, you and Coronis (read: no WIers) are the only two posters who will be confused about what to do between Viv and Weekes. At least if you're making polls have it be a close one, ignoring that you think Weekes and Barrington are massively underrated because it means the rest of CW – doesn't.
I feel like you got this hostile vibe, and all I did is roll eyes at you one time. Chill ataraxia, let's make peace.

:)
 

Coronis

Hall of Fame Member
please, you and Coronis (read: no WIers) are the only two posters who will be confused about what to do between Viv and Weekes. At least if you're making polls have it be a close one, ignoring that you think Weekes and Barrington are massively underrated because it means the rest of CW – doesn't.
lol. I have never said anything about Richards being inferior or hell even close to Weekes. He is easily top 3 Windies batsman of all time. I don’t even think ranking him 3rd (as I do) is that controversial, as most people would have Sobers/Lara/Viv in their top 10 bats of all time.

Obvs the controversial part comes from the others I rate above Viv.

Also lol @ seeing people rate Weekes > Barrington.

He was both a HTB and a minnow basher.
 

BazBall21

International Captain
The attack Weekes failed against in Australia was a lot better than the attacks Barrington faced. Most likely tougher pitches too given 50s tax. And Barrington has an average record against good pace at home. I will take Everton due to his strike rate.
 

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Barrington being a dominant force against great attacks and levelling up in tests is partly a myth too. He failed against WI who were arguably the strongest side of the era.
 

Coronis

Hall of Fame Member
Barrington being a dominant force against great attacks and levelling up in tests is partly a myth too. He failed against WI who were arguably the strongest side of the era.
His record is relatively subpar against them I agree.

Some random facts about those tests though:

17 tests played - England won 3 (2 in WI 1 at home) - WI won 4 (all in England) - weird to see splits like these for two teams

Barrington home vs away
14 innings 334 runs @ 23.85, 2 fifties
16 innings 708 runs @ 44.25, 3 tons, 2 fifties

He failed in their home win, in their 2 away wins:
170, 49, 2/34
48, DNB
 

Top