• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Wasim Akram vs Joel Garner

Who's the better bowler?


  • Total voters
    25

Migara

Cricketer Of The Year
Trying to figure out how that's relevant to the discussion tbh.
That is the whole issue. You add filters of your own, but not accept others.

Steyn and Ambrose regarded higher because they did well against best sides of their times. Imran did the same, but suddenly it does not count.

Secondly if number of wickets and WPM are applied as filters, so should be the conditions they have been achieved in. If Garner is marked down for <300 wickets and low WPM, Lillee should be for appalling / absent record ion sub continent / best side of the era.
 

kyear2

Cricketer Of The Year
That is the whole issue. You add filters of your own, but not accept others.

Steyn and Ambrose regarded higher because they did well against best sides of their times. Imran did the same, but suddenly it does not count.

Secondly if number of wickets and WPM are applied as filters, so should be the conditions they have been achieved in. If Garner is marked down for <300 wickets and low WPM, Lillee should be for appalling / absent record ion sub continent / best side of the era.
I mean that no one was even discussing him, like at all.
 

Top