• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Warne/McGrath vs Hadlee/Kallis

Which Test combination is greater?

  • Hadlee/Kallis

  • Warne/McGrath


Results are only viewable after voting.

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
Van Dijk being much ahead of Moore.
Unironically? Then the take rank in this order

Worst Take
Van Dijk a league ahead of Moore

Second Worst Take
Greenidge ahead of Compton

Third Worst Take
Greenidge ahead of Weekes

Fourth Worst Take
Kanhai ahead of Compton

Fifth Worse Take
Kanhai ahead of Weekes
 

capt_Luffy

Hall of Fame Member
Unironically? Then the take rank in this order

Worst Take
Van Dijk a league ahead of Moore

Second Worst Take
Greenidge ahead of Compton

Third Worst Take
Greenidge ahead of Weekes

Fourth Worst Take
Kanhai ahead of Compton

Fifth Worse Take
Kanhai ahead of Weekes
Combine 2nd and 3rd and 4th and 5th into one imo
 

Coronis

Hall of Fame Member
Like which game? McWarne are certainly better than Seales and Shamar no contest but as much as I rate bowlers over batsmen, you still do need runs to work with. And McWarne would also have to deal with WI catching/fielding. They may restrict Australia to a lower score but trust me, somehow WI would find a way to score less. Much less.
Either of the first two. Especially game 1, you think current Australia would have scored 310 in the second innings against McWarne? That Head, Webster and Carey are all scoring 60s? 150 far more likely and then Windies would’ve won. And all that is assuming they still manage 180 in the first.
 

Top