luckyeddie
Cricket Web Staff Member
What's wrong with a nice, clear "yo"?Waughney said:I think he meant to say ya mun.
What's wrong with a nice, clear "yo"?Waughney said:I think he meant to say ya mun.
It's not always like that, but I see what you mean.jhans said:Personally I think it takes away from any international competition when people are able to compete under a flag that is not their own. I was shocked this year when I found out that the Greece’s Olympic baseball team was comprised of Americans that couldn’t even speak Greek. It makes a mockery of the fundamental purpose of the event. If all you want to do is to field the most viable team available why not take down the flags and just play as independent professional clubs?
*pretends like he doesn't watch golf*luckyeddie said:It's not always like that, but I see what you mean.
We in Britain are part of a larger international community (the EC) and, like it or loathe it, there are regulations with respect to employment across the community, and regulations with respect to joint nationality as well. It's the same with other countries - and of course the whole thing gets abused or diluted whenever vested interests become involved.
There are times, though, when it pays to be European.
*cough*3 1/2 - 1/2 after the first four-balls*cough*
I can provide no light to the first subject but I would like to say that I hate those morons too. Furthermore, I really hate the morons that whistle loud and obnoxiously after every shot so that they can hear themselves on TV when they get home for the highlights.luckyeddie said:jhans:
With respect to the (checks thread title - ah!) USA cricket team, I'm not sure whether a residential qualification period of a number of years was applied prior to selection or not.
Perhaps you could enlighten me?
*notices USA are fighting back hard - currently keeping a log of morons who shout "In the hole" when someone tees off on a par-5*
BoyBrumby said:One thing that has puzzled me about the US team that perhaps someone could clear up for me is its make up. It seems to be peopled almost exclusively by Caribbean & Sub-Continent ex-pats. These are obviously the natural constituency for cricket in America, so that in itself isn't surprising. However, I do seem to recall that the UAE fielded a team in the 96 World Cup consisting for the most part of Indian & Pakistani ex-pat workers. The ICC then, in their wisdom, introduced a rule saying (I think) that 7 of the team for associate members had to be natives or citizens of the country they represent.
Did I imagine this or has the rule been rescinded since?
Yup, he's class. Without him you'd have struggled to beat us at the EC (though we made a mockery of the France and Germany games...dro87 said:Whe have Joe Scuderi who is a half Austalian half Italian who nearly got into the aussie 1996 world cup team and another couple of first class players (south Africans).
Precisely...Samuel_Vimes said:Yup, he's class. Without him you'd have struggled to beat us at the EC (though we made a mockery of the France and Germany games...)
Back on topic: first-class games are a great idea...but it has to be covered by some funding, I'm afraid. The biggest problem the minnows face are that all their players are "happy amateurs", whereas cricket is a game where professionalism really is required. Especially first-class cricket. Nobody can afford to take four days in ten off work regularly - and add training to that as well.