At the very least, our discussions were regarding a Cricket series on Cricket Web, after I was on topic discussing the batters mentioned in the list for 8-9 pages, 4 out of 4 posts from your end have been off topic not only to the topic but the site entirely, what even is your defense?
My defense? I just commented and responded for a bit here.
The top 9 is by any measure good, the order is not only crazy, but illustrates when cricket is observed through a spread sheet and devoid of context.
I don't think you have much room to complain here lol about being devoid of context. If anything that's just your base point, so I'm surprised this annoys you that much.
This is in a video?
Yes
One could argue is that was the case Hobbs would be no. 2, but yeah a bit over rating of the openers.
This I can go with.
Just curious. How did Sobers revolutionise batting and save the game?
Aggression. 6 6s in an over etc
Personally, would credit Lillian Thompson for starting the era of short pitched frightening pace, the mid 70s Ashes where they combined was the most brutal since arguably 1953, and perhaps Larwood's 1933 Bodyline. Imran became a pacer because of Lillee and West Indies made their pace quaret directly as a retalliation to Lillian Thompson. Would give the batting credit to IVA Richards, changed batting in the big three.
Lillee has the greatest legacy of any pacer with the possible exception of Imran.
I dont think Kimber would do that but I can't explain ranking Gavaskar so hígh.
You guys being so stuck up with Gavaskar at 7 while Graeme Smith is at 28 and Cook at 29..... Is a bit strange really.