• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Steve Smith vs Kane Williamson vs Joe Root

Who's better?


  • Total voters
    24

PlayerComparisons

International Captain
Nah Kano far weaker as a bat overall.
It’s close. Root has a mediocre record when batting at #3 and a mediocre rate of scoring hundreds so I prefer Kane who averages 60 since Roots debut. I guess Kane has a few more “holes” though so I can see why someone would prefer Root.

Kohli is clearly better than both though but seems to be underrated here for some reason.
 
Last edited:

Coronis

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
It’s close. Root has a mediocre record when batting at #3 and a mediocre rate of scoring hundreds so I prefer Kane who averages 60 since Roots debut. I guess Kane has a few more “holes” though so I can see why someone would prefer Root.

Kohli is clearly better than both though but seems to be underrated here for some reason.
lol. There are positives and negatives for all of Root, Kohli and Williamson. There isn’t a “clear” victor between them. Williamson is currently in his peak still unlike the others which also makes it harder to judge. Root is better across conditions, scores tons less often than the others but scores 50+ far more regularly. Kohli and Williamson both have high conversion rates and like to go big, but have big holes in their records.
 

capt_Luffy

Hall of Fame Member
lol. There are positives and negatives for all of Root, Kohli and Williamson. There isn’t a “clear” victor between them. Williamson is currently in his peak still unlike the others which also makes it harder to judge. Root is better across conditions, scores tons less often than the others but scores 50+ far more regularly. Kohli and Williamson both have high conversion rates and like to go big, but have big holes in their records.
Kohli really doesn't have many big holes in his record except for England, but then again he also have an ATG series there. Arguably the best in SA, near ATG in Australia, great at home. The strongest point against him imo is his trough from 2020-23.
 

centurymaker

Cricketer Of The Year
Across all formats, it's Kohli easily. Definitely the most complete batter amongst the fab four.

But since Kohli is not in the poll, its probably Smith then.
 

Top