MasterBlaster24
U19 Cricketer
.
I am going to stick my neck out and say Ganguly > Anwar. The best 3 bowling attackes in their playing days were Aus, SA and Pak. But since Anwar didn't face Pak let's take them out. Against Aus and SA, Ganguly averaged respectable 35 with 4 hundreds and 13 fifties while Anwar averaged 21 with 1 hundred and 0 fifties. Anwar bullied subcontinent teams a lot but somehow has a reputation of being a more all round batsman than Ganguly.
I think situations are a bit different. You could perform better than others against 2 best bowling side so you can get some brownie points in comparison but if you simply struggle in entire career then it's a huge black mark.@ankitj If we apply the same logic to the other thread, then Sangakkara > Ganguly because he performed well against South Africa and Australia.
This is just overseas performances against stronger teams.
- 124 vs Pak at Dhaka in 1999 in tri-series final to set up the highest successful chase in all ODIs at the time
- 183 vs SL at Taunton in 1999 world cup taking India to their highest ODI total at the time
- 141* vs SA at Nairobi in 2000 ICT semi final against Pollock & co.
- 117 vs NZ at Nairobi in 2000 ICT final (very next match) although Cairns chased down what should have been a winning total
- 141 vs Pak at Adelaide in 2000 against Wasim, Akhtar, Saqlain
- That crazy bi-lateral series vs Pak in 1997 in Toronto when Ganguly was the top scorer, top wicket taker and also had the best batting as well as bowling average of anyone who had an average.