• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Prime McGrath Vs Prime Steve Smith

Better peak?


  • Total voters
    18

BazBall21

International Captain
McGrath sustained peak levels for longer and bowlers have a bit more say on test match results than batsmen. Both were superbly dominant and did it everywhere.
 

Coronis

Hall of Fame Member
Though the bowling numbers may not exactly play it out, McGrath’s peak was definitely in the 00’s. Rising averages in batting and bowling everywhere and he just basically maintained the same level. Was crazy.
 

BazBall21

International Captain
Though the bowling numbers may not exactly play it out, McGrath’s peak was definitely in the 00’s. Rising averages in batting and bowling everywhere and he just basically maintained the same level. Was crazy.
His 2000-2005 numbers were pretty much the exact same as 1995-1999. Became an incredibly dominant outlier.
 

subshakerz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Peak = phase of career of highest performance

Prime = duration of career when player has achieved full maturity till decline
 

sayon basak

Cricketer Of The Year
Peak = phase of career of highest performance

Prime = duration of career when player has achieved full maturity till decline
Peak and prime are meant to be the same thing, don't think pulling out random definitions out of thin air is very useful.
 

Top