They might just end up fighting each other till the second coming and not get any actual selection done.Steve Waugh
Shane Warne
That is all.
Perhaps that was my intentionThey might just end up fighting each other till the second coming and not get any actual selection done.
hahahahaPics?![]()
i was thinking the same thing actually, there's always an excuse with lee, it could never be the fact that he's played ****.HWhat;s the bet that this boofhead panel dismisses Lee's woes since India by blaming his ankle? First it was his marriage, then gastro, and now the ankle. No doubt his ankle is injured, just as there is no doubt that, like many 32 year old guys who rely on pace, his effectiveness is rapidly fading. One of the problems as I see it, is that people use McGrath as the barometer in terms of fast bowlers (he went through until 37), rather than the more realistic example of Gillespie (who lost his nip when the same age as Lee i.e. 32).
glad someone agrees with me, he's so frustrating, and yet all the media wanted to talk about during his year as 12th man was why he should be in the team, and poor brett lee 12th man while the men in the team did an infinitely better job.I think the term which applies to Lee is 'regression toward the mean'. He had one good year, good on him. Doesn't change the fact he'll likely go down as the worst Test bowler to take 300+ wickets.
What's particularly infuriating about it was that during his one good year, he seemed to have figured out how to bowl without relying on pace. Smart lines, awkward lengths and still good pace. Since then, he's been back to yorker/bouncer Lee so many times. Where did new Lee go? He was a far, far, far better bowler.
Nope. Don't have a say IIRC or at least officially they don't, but in saying that I could be wrong.aren't the captain and coach included ?
I think the term which applies to Lee is 'regression toward the mean'. He had one good year, good on him. Doesn't change the fact he'll likely go down as the worst Test bowler to take 300+ wickets.
What's particularly infuriating about it was that during his one good year, he seemed to have figured out how to bowl without relying on pace. Smart lines, awkward lengths and still good pace. Since then, he's been back to yorker/bouncer Lee so many times. Where did new Lee go? He was a far, far, far better bowler.
JL loves everyone though.An old Inside Cricket article suggested Justin Langer would make a good selector. They got some boffin in with a dozen titles next to his name to do a psychological assessment on the Australian cricket team
he sounded alright when he did a bit of commentary on abc during the perth test, he always crossed me as someoen who'd taken one too many hits to the head the way he spoke, but he was quite insightfulAn old Inside Cricket article suggested Justin Langer would make a good selector. They got some boffin in with a dozen titles next to his name to do a psychological assessment on the Australian cricket team
that might be just on tour, or do the selectors go on tour nowadaysNope. Don't have a say IIRC or at least officially they don't, but in saying that I could be wrong.
waste of time, just shoehorn in the next battery of pacemen and they should be right in a couple of years, i dare say most of them should turn out better than leeMarried life clearly agreed with him.
Was the best 12-18 months of his career!!
For the sake of our attack, would strongly suggest CA invest in some last-ditch marriage counselling for he and Liz.