• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Peter May vs Clement Hill

May vs Hill


  • Total voters
    10

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
Yeah but Hill plays on significantly tougher wkts though... Especially away from home
Batting average in Hill's games in England – 23.68
Batting average in May's games in Australia – 25.36

Rest of Australian Batsmen in Hill's English Ashes – 20.36
Rest of English Batsmen in May's Australian Ashes – 21.06

May averaged 40 in Australian Ashes, Hill did 29 in English. May also had significantly tougher home conditions
 

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
Would need to check but don't think so. Agree on the fact though that May did better at home
Batting average in Hill's games in Australia – 28.38
Batting average in May's games in England – 24.80

Batting average in Hill's games in Australian Ashes – 27.41
Batting average in May's games in English Ashes – 24.72

May 57 at home and 54 in English Ashes, Hill did 41 at home and 39 in Australian Ashes.
 

Thala_0710

International Captain
Batting average in Hill's games in Australia – 28.38
Batting average in May's games in England – 24.80

Batting average in Hill's games in Australian Ashes – 27.41
Batting average in May's games in English Ashes – 24.72

May 57 at home and 54 in English Ashes, Hill did 41 at home and 39 in Australian Ashes.
How did you get 24.8? It's 29.12 on statsguru..
It's 28.54 in the English Ashes....
For Hill those numbers look closer to correct
 

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
Nah this doesn't work because the Engine registration of the equation leads to him calculating the output of home teams and adding it all in, IE in England it would take England's overall, in Australia it would only take Australia's overall output, in West Indies it would only take West Indies's overall output etc, add all of it up and give you the output of home teams in all of May's games with no geographical limits.

the overall output with both teams combined in England in May's games is 24.80


The overall output with both teams combined in Australia in Hill's games is 28.38


basically May has harder home conditions and while Hill's English Ashes was harder than May's Australian Ashes, the latter's performance is superior by a larger margin that renders it meaningless
 

Thala_0710

International Captain
Nah this doesn't work because the Engine registration of the equation leads to him calculating the output of home teams and adding it all in, IE in England it would take England's overall, in Australia it would only take Australia's overall output, in West Indies it would only take West Indies's overall output etc, add all of it up and give you the output of home teams in all of May's games with no geographical limits.

the overall output with both teams combined in England in May's games is 24.80


The overall output with both teams combined in Australia in Hill's games is 28.38


basically May has harder home conditions and while Hill's English Ashes was harder than May's Australian Ashes, the latter's performance is superior by a larger margin that renders it meaningless
Fair enough
 

MasterBlaster24

U19 Cricketer
Batting average in May's games in England – 24.80
Batting average is that low mainly because of England's bowling, to be honest.

Bowling stats of other teams against England when Peter May was in the side.👇


England's bowling stats against other teams when Peter May was in the side.👇


That said, both the Australian and South African (1955) bowling attacks performed exceptionally well during that period.

So his batting performances against Australia in home Ashes series and against South Africa were truly legendary, and he deserves massive credit for that.
And finally, it’s worth mentioning that his performances in the away Ashes were also outstanding.
 
Last edited:

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
Batting average is that low mainly because of England's bowling, to be honest.

Bowling stats of other teams against England when Peter May was in the side.👇


England's bowling stats against other teams when Peter May was in the side.👇


That said, both the Australian and South African (1955) bowling attacks performed exceptionally well during that period.


So his batting performances against Australia in home Ashes series and against South Africa were truly legendary, and he deserves massive credit for that.




And finally, it’s worth mentioning that his performances in the away Ashes were also outstanding.

Yeah, West Indies seem to have gotten pretty flat pitches in 1957 but generally this statistic is ridiculous as only two serieses even extend beyond 30 average in May's era.


Going by touring bowlers, touring bowlers in Hill era Australia averaged 31.67


while touring bowlers to May's England averaged 32.46, less than one point difference and would be equal if Hill was as good as May likely


You pointed out Australia and South Africa, In Hill's home games they were the only tourists and had inferior output to what Australia and South Africa had in May's England



all in all, the home conditions are at worst imo relative and at best in May's favour, and it's 57 vs 41, against the two common tourists at home that Hill got IE Australia and South Africa, May averages 60.

as you showed, May was great in away Ashes, Hill wasn't.
 

MasterBlaster24

U19 Cricketer
Yeah, West Indies seem to have gotten pretty flat pitches in 1957 but generally this statistic is ridiculous as only two serieses even extend beyond 30 average in May's era.
Pitches in England in the 1950s were generally bowling-friendly.

But Yeah, that’s because Trueman and co. were elite with the ball in that era in England, like I mentioned earlier. They were kinda like the Ashwin and Jadeja duo at home, literally unplayable.


all in all, the home conditions are at worst imo relative and at best in May's favour, and it's 57 vs 41, against the two common tourists at home that Hill got IE Australia and South Africa, May averages 60.

as you showed, May was great in away Ashes, Hill wasn't.
I rate May > Hill as Test batters too, so no issue with that.
 
Last edited:

Top