May for his away Ashes imo, averaged 40 in Australia, Hill 28. Plus May averages 57 at home, Hill 41.Hill just for me...
Yeah but Hill plays on significantly tougher wkts though... Especially away from homeMay for his away Ashes imo, averaged 40 in Australia, Hill 28. Plus May averages 57 at home, Hill 41.
Batting average in Hill's games in England – 23.68Yeah but Hill plays on significantly tougher wkts though... Especially away from home
Would need to check but don't think so. Agree on the fact though that May did better at homeMay also had significantly tougher home conditions
Batting average in Hill's games in Australia – 28.38Would need to check but don't think so. Agree on the fact though that May did better at home
How did you get 24.8? It's 29.12 on statsguru..Batting average in Hill's games in Australia – 28.38
Batting average in May's games in England – 24.80
Batting average in Hill's games in Australian Ashes – 27.41
Batting average in May's games in English Ashes – 24.72
May 57 at home and 54 in English Ashes, Hill did 41 at home and 39 in Australian Ashes.
?????How did you get 24.8? It's 29.12 on statsguru..
It's 28.54 in the English Ashes....
For Hill those numbers look closer to correct
Nah this doesn't work because the Engine registration of the equation leads to him calculating the output of home teams and adding it all in, IE in England it would take England's overall, in Australia it would only take Australia's overall output, in West Indies it would only take West Indies's overall output etc, add all of it up and give you the output of home teams in all of May's games with no geographical limits.
Fair enoughNah this doesn't work because the Engine registration of the equation leads to him calculating the output of home teams and adding it all in, IE in England it would take England's overall, in Australia it would only take Australia's overall output, in West Indies it would only take West Indies's overall output etc, add all of it up and give you the output of home teams in all of May's games with no geographical limits.
the overall output with both teams combined in England in May's games is 24.80
![]()
Batting records | Test matches | Cricinfo Statsguru | ESPNcricinfo.com
stats.espncricinfo.com
The overall output with both teams combined in Australia in Hill's games is 28.38
basically May has harder home conditions and while Hill's English Ashes was harder than May's Australian Ashes, the latter's performance is superior by a larger margin that renders it meaningless
Batting average is that low mainly because of England's bowling, to be honest.Batting average in May's games in England – 24.80
Yeah, West Indies seem to have gotten pretty flat pitches in 1957 but generally this statistic is ridiculous as only two serieses even extend beyond 30 average in May's era.Batting average is that low mainly because of England's bowling, to be honest.
Bowling stats of other teams against England when Peter May was in the side.
England's bowling stats against other teams when Peter May was in the side.
That said, both the Australian and South African (1955) bowling attacks performed exceptionally well during that period.
So his batting performances against Australia in home Ashes series and against South Africa were truly legendary, and he deserves massive credit for that.
And finally, it’s worth mentioning that his performances in the away Ashes were also outstanding.
Pitches in England in the 1950s were generally bowling-friendly.Yeah, West Indies seem to have gotten pretty flat pitches in 1957 but generally this statistic is ridiculous as only two serieses even extend beyond 30 average in May's era.
I rate May > Hill as Test batters too, so no issue with that.all in all, the home conditions are at worst imo relative and at best in May's favour, and it's 57 vs 41, against the two common tourists at home that Hill got IE Australia and South Africa, May averages 60.
as you showed, May was great in away Ashes, Hill wasn't.