• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Pat Cummins vs Dennis Lillee

Better bowler?


  • Total voters
    31

Coronis

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Cummins needs a few good performances in England and India imo before he gets quite up there. Plus you know to actually finish his career. Still a baby boi.
 

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
Bad in Asia and generally unremarkable away. Plus had the luxury of bowling in a strong lineup. Still somehow rated on par with Bumrah and above Anderson.
29.83 in Asia isn't bad persay, and it's better than not having an Asia record like Lillee. I do agree Lillee was better too, lonewolf, bowled on generally flatter wickets and had a stupid 5.5 WPM a decade into his career.
 

capt_Luffy

Hall of Fame Member
29.83 in Asia isn't bad persay, and it's better than not having an Asia record like Lillee. I do agree Lillee was better too, lonewolf, bowled on generally flatter wickets and had a stupid 5.5 WPM a decade into his career.
Australia was stupidly flatter till 2020 and while Cummins only played for 3 years, he did excellent in them
 

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
Australia was stupidly flatter till 2020 and while Cummins only played for 3 years, he did excellent in them
one could argue the change started coming as soon as the sandpaper gate, 2018 BGT was pretty sporting outside of the Sydney wicket. That really only leaves the 2017 Ashes.
 

Top