Thala_0710
International Regular
NoWould WI take Hadlee for Marshall?
NoWould WI take Hadlee for Marshall?
Interesting. I think NZ take Marshall as they would prefer an outright pacer.
Would he able to bowl as many of the overs as Hadlee did though? If he can they maybe yesInteresting. I think NZ take Marshall as they would prefer an outright pacer.
YesWould WI take Hadlee for Marshall?
NoWould WI take Hadlee for Marshall?
NoWould WI take Hadlee for Marshall?
n00b opinionSteyn's away record is entirely India reliant
I say later on it's very good everywhere thoughn00b opinion
why would you take the inferior bowler if you don't have some weak batting.
He did in his prime. He was a workhorse.Would he able to bowl as many of the overs as Hadlee did though? If he can they maybe yes
Maybe because you are so rich with bowling resources you might opt for a better no.8.why would you take the inferior bowler if you don't have some weak batting.
So Aus would opt for Smith captaining over Border?No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Maybe Hadlee was not an inferior bowler and would have been even better if he bowled with better support.Maybe because you are so rich with bowling resources you might opt for a better no.8.
Debatable. Marshall was no slouch with the bat. Better question is would WI take Imran over Marshall?Would WI take Hadlee for Marshall?
In the mid 80s, almost certainly would.Debatable. Marshall was no slouch with the bat. Better question is would WI take Imran over Marshall?
YesBetter question is would WI take Imran over Marshall?
feel like there's a clear gap between them on flat pitches.Maybe Hadlee was not an inferior bowler and would have been even better if he bowled with better support.