• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

James Faulkner vs Jimmy Neesham vs Corey Anderson

Paranoid Kendroid

Cricket Spectator
This is how I would go - Neesham, Faulkner, Corey.

But if we are only picking peak versions of them, then Faulkner, Neesham, Corey.

What's y'alls opinion?
 

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
Would be kind of silly to mention three guys with nothing Test careers and then make it a Test only comparison.
 

Coronis

Hall of Fame Member
Would be kind of silly to mention three guys with nothing Test careers and then make it a Test only comparison.
Well the OP is a new poster so I couldn’t speak to their state of mind. But that would be a perfect comparison to make lol
 

Top