centurymaker
Cricketer Of The Year
Who is a better player in Test cricket? (bowling + batting)
Jadeja or Ashwin
Let's have a poll to settle this!
Jadeja or Ashwin
Let's have a poll to settle this!
Jadeja is actually India's best batsman in the last 3 years barring Rohit and Pant. He makes the team as a specialist batsman in his own merit and yes that means India can and should play Ashwin as the specialist spinner in the side. And play 3 pacers.I'd have said Ashwin a while back but Jadeja's consistent batting overseas has made it hard to argue for Ashwin now.
But I will stick to the opinion that the selectors have gotten it completely wrong by selecting only one of them overseas (usually Jadeja as of late). They are both so good it feels ****ing stupid to play some random batsman or fast bowling no rounder to conform to outdated notions that two spinners can't play overseas. India proved that to be wrong by having them both and succeeding in the supposed spinner's graveyard of all places. Watching Ashwin bowl so well in the WTC final when even our spearhead Bumrah **** the bad and to then see him not being selected for a single test in England is always going to rankle hard. They can both bat ffs, there's no reason to drop either of them.
The WTC lineup style was perfect, maybe at best you remove a dead body in the top order to bring in a bowler.I'd have said Ashwin a while back but Jadeja's consistent batting overseas has made it hard to argue for Ashwin now.
But I will stick to the opinion that the selectors have gotten it completely wrong by selecting only one of them overseas (usually Jadeja as of late). They are both so good it feels ****ing stupid to play some random batsman or fast bowling no rounder to conform to outdated notions that two spinners can't play overseas. India proved that to be wrong by having them both and succeeding in the supposed spinner's graveyard of all places. Watching Ashwin bowl so well in the WTC final when even our spearhead Bumrah **** the bad and to then see him not being selected for a single test in England is always going to rankle hard. They can both bat ffs, there's no reason to drop either of them.
Ashwin scores his against WI.Ravindra Jadeja is the better batsman but interestingly, Ashwin scores a century every 25.4 innings whereas Jadeja scores a century every 30 innings
Jadeja also had the opportunity to score more centuries against the West Indies, also Jadeja only averages 24 thereAshwin scores his against WI.
Jadeja picks up more top order wickets!Ashwin because he picks up wickets in huge clumps , a genuine match winner with over 30 5 wicket hauls..I think he's also the best test captain India has never had ..and he's got more test hundreds than Jadeja so no mug with the bat .
NoJadeja also had the opportunity to score more centuries against the West Indies, also Jadeja only averages 24 there
That's not true, according to Howstat , 60 of Jadeja's 249 test wickets are top order batsman (24%)Jadeja picks up more top order wickets!
No![]()
To provide additional information, I have listed five high wicket-takers who missed out on the top ten. Shane Warne, James Anderson and Broad have WQI averages higher than 1.02, while Courtney Walsh and Murali just about break even. Murali took a lot of late-order wickets. Kumble has an average WQI value of around 0.99. Overall, spinners find it difficult to get on to the table. Ravindra Jadeja is the highest-placed spinner, in 14th place, with an average WQI of 1.037.