Inzamam-ul-Haq vs Kevin Pietersen

[GIMH]

You're right but I did imply I was facetiously discounting it.

If the 2005 Ashes comes up I’m there bro. It’s like saying candyman on a CW mirror

 

[Jack1]

Pietersen

 

[Adders]

Ones a fat **** the other just a ****. I vote for the fat one.

 

[sayon basak]

Surprising result.

 

[Coronis]

Surprising result.

Is it?

 

[Athlai]

Surprising result.

 

[govinda indian fan]

Only 1 of these players knew how to hold bat against Glenn McGrath . KP scored nearly 500 runs in Ashes 2006 against McWarne in Aus. Inzy averaged 0.5 against McGrath in 00 in AUS(2 runs in 2 Tests). Inzy record against SA was even more poor . Guy simply didn't know how to play quality pace attack.

@subshakerz imran called inzi greatest player of pace bowling after viv

 

[subshakerz]

@subshakerz imran called inzi greatest player of pace bowling after viv

Well to be fair he also said Inzi failed to achieve his potential.

 

[govinda indian fan]

Imran also called imran nazir next viv Richards and mohd sami next Malcolm Marshall man deserves to be in jail for these ridiculous comparisons

 

[govinda indian fan]

Imran also called imran nazir next viv Richards and mohd sami next Malcolm Marshall man deserves to be in jail for these ridiculous comparisons

imran fans just kidding sorry if you guys are offended

 

[subshakerz]

Imran also called imran nazir next viv Richards and mohd sami next Malcolm Marshall man deserves to be in jail for these ridiculous comparisons

To be fair, he was basing that off their raw abilities as in Imran Nazir was a natural timer of the ball and Sami bowled 90 MPH with a skiddy action. But he shouldn't have wasted his time as both were brainless.

 

[Athlai]

Presumably he also judged Inzi's unparalleled ability to face fast bowling by his unrivalled ability to eat fast food.

 

[Coronis]

To be fair, he was basing that off their raw abilities as in Imran Nazir was a natural timer of the ball and Sami bowled 90 MPH with a skiddy action. But he shouldn't have wasted his time as both were brainless.

Makes sense considering his own actions

 

[govinda indian fan]

Well to be fair he also said Inzi failed to achieve his potential.

Can you plz show me statement or video where imran said that inzi is underachiver

 

[govinda indian fan]

To be fair, he was basing that off their raw abilities as in Imran Nazir was a natural timer of the ball and Sami bowled 90 MPH with a skiddy action. But he shouldn't have wasted his time as both were brainless.

But he made a mistake in judgement he is human afterall. Of course he did found waqar and inzi and had great eye for talent but even he is prone for mistake

 

[sayon basak]

Can you plz show me statement or video where imran said that inzi is underachiver

Imran Khan praising Inzamam ul Haq in 2006

youtube.com

 

[Johan]

Pietersen was the more complete Batsmen, better technique against pace and was comparetively better against spin than Inzi against pace, Inzi's argument should be longevity.

 

[BazBall21]

Pietersen. Good record v Australia&SAF and very decent in Asia. More big hundreds too. Inzy had major technical shortcomings v bounce and seam.

 

[subshakerz]

Pietersen was the more complete Batsmen, better technique against pace and was comparetively better against spin than Inzi against pace, Inzi's argument should be longevity.

Inzi simply has better output except vs Australia.

 

[Johan]

Inzi simply has better output except vs Australia.

and Saffers