reasoning?Amla
It should count in favor of Worrell if anything.Never played in the subcontinent as well.
in England his record is pretty great I'd argue, fair enough on AustraliaFW’s away record doesn’t look too impressive.
It’s not bad. But certainly not great either.
Avg of 35 in Aus - 2 average tours.
Avg of 46 in Eng - 1 great tour & 2 average tours.
Never played in the subcontinent as well.
Significantly better than the other two Ws especially.in England his record is pretty great I'd argue, fair enough on Australia
England in his time was extremely tough though.3 tours to England
1950 : 539 runs @ 89
1957 : 350 runs @ 38
1963 : 142 runs @ 20
Overall : 1031 runs @ 46
Feel his record is boosted by 1 innings of 261.
Good record overall.
the 260 was a match winning inning so it's not like fluff stat pad.3 tours to England
1950 : 539 runs @ 89
1957 : 350 runs @ 38
1963 : 142 runs @ 20
Overall : 1031 runs @ 46
Feel his record is boosted by 1 innings of 261.
Good record overall.
Worrell was the 3rd best captain of all time imo.Okay, if batting only then Worrell just.
If alround, then Worrell by a decent margin.
Top 2 for me. Who are the other 2?Worrell was the 3rd best captain of all time imo.
Top 5 imo:-Top 2 for me. Who are the other 2?
another thing where the answer is HuttonTop 5 imo:-
Mashrafe
Dhoni
Worrell
Benaud
Rohit
Don't think he was as good as Rohit, same tier as Babar Azam imo.another thing where the answer is Hutton
Our Block's resident drunker on a Saturday night will lead a team in Tests better than RohitDon't think he was as good as Rohit, same tier as Babar Azam imo.
I bet he'll average more than 6.2 as well.Our Block's resident drunker on a Saturday night will lead a team in Tests better than Rohit
Worrell in the subcontinent for Commonwealth XI:Never played in the subcontinent as well.