-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
Harry Brook vs Devon Conway
- Thread starter PlayerComparisons
- Start date
Athlai
Not Terrible
Yeah a real trouncing by Brook in the longer term here. Conway is probably slightly better than his slump and having to open the batting are making his figures look. But even batting at #3-4 and getting a longer run I think he'd probably average very early 40s over a career. (IMO comparable to Vaughan or Strauss)
Brook showing all the signs of someone that could well finish up with an average still in the 50s. Don't think he has much competition in recent history for English bats outside of Pietersen and Root.
Brook showing all the signs of someone that could well finish up with an average still in the 50s. Don't think he has much competition in recent history for English bats outside of Pietersen and Root.
Johan
Hall of Fame Member
Pietersen not in that class.