Hadlee vs Murali - who is the better lone gun?

[capt_Luffy]

Both would do excellent depending on the pitch. But Hadlee could bowl them out on Day 1, session 1.

Very unlikely if the opposition isn't ****. The break Hadlee would need between spells would be deadly for his team.

 

[Gob]

I like how it rhymes

 

[Fuller Pilch]

Here I am not arguing against Hadlee. He pretty clearly was the superior bowler as well as the lone warrior. Though, except Vaas, the other bowlers were big liabilities more often than not for SL over that period. Most Kiwi bowlers like Cairns, Collinge, Taylor, especially Chatfield etc. weren't most of the times a liability.

Did Hadlee ever play with Taylor? Must've been very early in his career when Sir RJH was mediocre.

Early career Morrison and 4th innings John Bracewell were pretty decent.

 

[howitzer]

Did Hadlee ever play with Taylor? Must've been very early in his career when Sir RJH was mediocre.

Early career Morrison and 4th innings John Bracewell were pretty decent.

Two matches.

 

[kyear2]

If it's a bad team, him having longer spells means the opposing team is amassing huge scores. That means losses, not draws.

This.