Fred Trueman vs Michael Holding vs Waqar Younis

[sayon basak]

The better bowler?

 

[Johan]

Trueman>Holding>Younis

 

[Thala_0710]

Holding>Trueman>Waqar for me

 

[PlayerComparisons]

Trueman

 

[shortpitched713]

Trueman > Waqar > Holding

 

[kyear2]

Trueman > Waqar > Holding

Oh wow that's wrong, lol

 

[shortpitched713]

Oh wow that's wrong, lol

Who's the straw that stirs the drink? I.e. how good was he without one or both of Garner and Marshall.

Same goes for Garner and Marshall too, I suppose, but their averages in all conditions are so immaculate that I don't need to nitpick like that. With Holding, against this stiff of competition, I think you do.

 

[kyear2]

Who's the straw that stirs the drink? I.e. how good was he without one or both of Garner and Marshall.

Same goes for Garner and Marshall too, I suppose, but their averages in all conditions are so immaculate that I don't need to nitpick like that. With Holding, against this stiff of competition, I think you do.

Garner wasn't that great in the 70's and it was Holding who was the no. 1 till '83.

He stirred it.

 

[Johan]

Waqar away stats in major countries

Australia: 14 wickets at 40.5
England: 45 wickets at 27.49
India: 2 wickets at 76.5
South Africa: 20 wickets at 28.3
New Zealand: 34 wickets at 27.18
West Indies: 24 wickets at 24.83

not on holding's level

 

[Coronis]

how good was he without one or both of Garner and Marshall.

Holding overall: 60 matches 249 @ 23.68
without Garner: 20 matches 88 @ 23.82
without Marshall: 27 matches 120 @ 21.97
without either: 13 matches 57 @ 23.64

 

[Johan]

this is very weird