Dravid vs Clarke, who was better against high quality bowling?

[PlayerComparisons]

Dravid obviously had the far greater career but who would you pick against a really high quality ATG level bowling attack?

 

[Adorable Asshole]

Dravid easily. Clarke was just a FTB.

 

[PlayerComparisons]

Dravid easily. Clarke was just a FTB.

Not sure about Clarke being a FTB. He has a good record in Eng, SA, and NZ

 

[PlayerComparisons]

Leaning towards Clarke since he averaged 67 against SA while Dravid averaged 33 against SA

 

[subshakerz]

Clarke averaged less than 40 away from home.

 

[Kirkut]

Clarke vs SA in 2011/12 or Dravid 2011 in the UK.

Dravid leads but not by a big margin.

 

[subshakerz]

Clarke vs SA in 2011/12 or Dravid 2011 in the UK.

Dravid leads but not by a big margin.

You mean Clarke's series on roads? Dravid easily.

 

[BazBall21]

That series was Dravid's finest hour. Had his struggles against very deep attacks prior to that, batting tempo wasn't suited.

 

[Kirkut]

You mean Clarke's series on roads? Dravid easily.

No, not when SA toured Aus. I'm talking about that epic tour where Clarke made 151 at Cape Town in unplayable conditions and this was verified with Australia reeling at 21/9 in 2nd innings.