Denis Compton vs Chanderpaul

[MasterBlaster24]

Better test batter out of these two?

 

[Coronis]

I think Compton is overrated and Chanders is underrated.

 

[DrWolverine]

TIL Compton averages 30s in Aus, SA & NZ
He must have been the Kane Williamson of that era

 

[Johan]

TIL Compton averages 30s in Aus, SA & NZ
He must have been the Kane Williamson of that era

analysis by checklist is rarely accurate, how about you contextualize his away tours.

 

[capt_Luffy]

analysis by checklist is rarely accurate, how about you contextualize his away tours.

I mean, it's saying like Kane Williamson is a bad batsman......

 

[Coronis]

analysis by checklist is rarely accurate

@Prince EWS convert?

 

[Johan]

I mean, it's saying like Kane Williamson is a bad batsman......

Kane over Chanders for me

 

[capt_Luffy]

Kane over Chanders for me

As it should be for literally anybody.....

 

[Johan]

As it should be for literally anybody.....

except for Analysis by checklist merchants thinking Chanderpaul was some elite ATG in England.

 

[PlayerComparisons]

I mean, it's saying like Kane Williamson is a bad batsman......

He isn’t?

 

[Johan]

Chanderpaul votes against Compton is crazy talk

 

[sayon basak]

 

[sayon basak]

Kane over Chanders for me

Wow so bold of you to say that.

 

[Johan]

@PlayerComparisons what's the case for Chanderpaul over Compton lol

 

[Prince EWS]

Wow so bold of you to say that.

Kane over Chanders for me

 

[Johan]

@Majestic Chanderpual vs Williamson, who is better?

 

[BazBall21]

Think Kane is universally rated higher than Chanderpaul on here. No war to fight there for you @Johan

 

[Johan]

Think Kane is universally rated higher than Chanderpaul on here. No war to fight there for you @Johan

iirc Majestic did argue Cook over Williamson because Cook averaged 42 in Ind/Aus/SA/NZ while Kane averages like 32 in the same countries (England comes in for New Zealand), by the same line of thought Chanderpaul should be above Williamson.

obviously I think the line of thought is insane but it is there.

 

[BazBall21]

iirc Majestic did argue Cook over Williamson because Cook averaged 42 in Ind/Aus/SA/NZ while Kane averages like 32 in the same countries (England comes in for New Zealand), by the same line of thought Chanderpaul should be above Williamson.

obviously I think the line of thought is insane but it is there.

I guess he would argue Kane has the batting position factor over Chanderpaul

 

[Johan]

I guess he would argue Kane has the batting position factor over Chanderpaul

Yeah that's an argument he really should make and actually works.