CricAddict
Cricketer Of The Year
If someone has a stretch of 52 tests averaging greater than Bradman but performs badly on either side of it and plays around 150 tests or so, will you rate the guy a better batsman than Bradman?
The question came from another thread where Bumrah has achieved better in 40 tests what Laker has done over his whole career already but there is a chance he might get bad after this. So, will you rate Bumrah better than Laker or worse if he got worse in his tests after this?
The question came from another thread where Bumrah has achieved better in 40 tests what Laker has done over his whole career already but there is a chance he might get bad after this. So, will you rate Bumrah better than Laker or worse if he got worse in his tests after this?