OK Burkey, No one has any idea. So, Mate, in the interests of not letting this thread dieburkey_1988 said:No, most bowlers in a MATCH (ie both innings). BTW, the record for bowlers in an innings is NINE



OK Burkey, No one has any idea. So, Mate, in the interests of not letting this thread dieburkey_1988 said:No, most bowlers in a MATCH (ie both innings). BTW, the record for bowlers in an innings is NINE
Okay, the record is 16 bowlers used in both innings of a ODI match. Is it asking too much to list the instances? ( It happened 5 times to my knowledge )JASON said:OK Burkey, No one has any idea. So, Mate, in the interests of not letting this thread die, would you post a subtle clue, so someone will get close to the answer and we can keep the thread alive !
![]()
![]()
What do you mean?cameeel said:depends if you have any scope of the possible numbers
One match was between Kenya and Bangladesh in Oct 97 when they used 8 bowlers each.burkey_1988 said:Okay, the record is 16 bowlers used in both innings of a ODI match. Is it asking too much to list the instances? ( It happened 5 times to my knowledge )
By the way, it isn't that hard to guess numbers, is it?
I did not have that one ...SJS said:One match was between Kenya and Bangladesh in Oct 97 when they used 8 bowlers each.
I was just looking for tall scoring matches between weaker teams and saw thisburkey_1988 said:I did not have that one ...
Its not for not WANTING to finish. I am, for example, just not able to locate the matches. Its not a player or a team to guess its some matches. How to find them among thousandsburkey_1988 said:If you guys don't want to finish this question, that's fine. I agree with Jason, it's not going anywhere. So we can continue or someone else can post a question if they please.
That's the problem ... what kind of clues could I give?SJS said:Its not for not WANTING to finish. I am, for example, just not able to locate the matches. Its not a player or a team to guess its some matches. How to find them among thousands![]()
Since SJS has given one instance of this, you could list the other instances, then SJS can ask next question ! (I notice SJS due to ask next question in New cricket trivia thread too )burkey_1988 said:That's the problem ... what kind of clues could I give?
You could give the ground and the date and we could guess the teamsburkey_1988 said:That's the problem ... what kind of clues could I give?
I found this:SJS said:Before Jason lodges another complainthere is a simple question.
Why is the position third man called by this name ?
Typed some stuff into Google a few times ... dunno if it is accurateSJS said:Where did you find that ??
I see ... there are probably many stories aroundSJS said:Thats not what I have I am afraid.
You did think it up didn't you ?burkey_1988 said:How about this?
The term third man originally denoted a position that was beginning to be used more often (with the spread of overarm bowling and the development of off-theory attack) to supplement the more established close offside fielding positions of point and short-slip. The new fieldsman was thus the third man up.