What are these numbers?Hazelwood - 74
Shami - 76
Boult - 78
Starc - 95
Where he ranks them in his bowler rankings I thinkWhat are these numbers?
Oh my God! That's insane.Where he ranks them in his bowler rankings I think
What too much free time, and an obsession with cricket, data and datasets does to a mf......Oh my God! That's insane.
Just curious where Shakib sits in that list.Hazelwood - 74
Shami - 76
Boult - 78
Starc - 95
Didn't made my Top 150 bowlers. Sits at 55 among spinners and 14 at All Rounders. Oh, Taijul sits at 58 and Mehedy at 73.Just curious where Shakib sits in that list.
Just gonna Guess the top 14 as I have absolutely nothing to do.Didn't made my Top 150 bowlers. Sits at 55 among spinners and 14 at All Rounders.
Benaud is not there, not in top 30. He was an Ashwin tier bat and worse bowler. Definitely WG counts. Stokes hardly makes my top 20.Just gonna Guess the top 14 as I have absolutely nothing to do.
Sobers
Imran
Kallis
Miller
Hadlee
botham
Kapil
Pollock
Benaud
Faulkner
Procter
Jadeja
And.....stokes?
Isn't sure if WG counts as an all rounder.
Oh I forgot Ashwin. Also is shakib really that much better than stokes?Benaud is not there, not in top 30. He was an Ashwin tier bat and worse bowler. Definitely WG counts. Stokes hardly makes my top 20.
Chris Cairns would be there too and Tony Greig.Just gonna Guess the top 14 as I have absolutely nothing to do.
Sobers
Imran
Kallis
Miller
Hadlee
botham
Kapil
Pollock
Benaud
Faulkner
Procter
Jadeja
And.....stokes?
Isn't sure if WG counts as an all rounder.
Imo yes. Stokes' bowling is overplayed and batting overrated. Ashwin is also like 30th, for all-rounders I focus more on balance.Oh I forgot Ashwin. Also is shakib really that much better than stokes?
Imo yes. Stokes' bowling is overplayed and batting overrated. Ashwin is also like 30th, for all-rounders I focus more on balance.
Grace
Sobers
Imran
Kallis
Miller
Procter
Botham
Rhodes
Pollock
Dev
Faulkner
Jadeja
Hadlee
Shakib
Rice
Barlow
Woolley
Noble
Goddard
Stokes
Greig
Hammond
Cairns
Mankad
Armstrong
[/QUOTE!
And Flintoff, Vettori?
Does balanced mean to be very close in both discipline only, or being so at the same time?for all-rounders I focus more on balance.
Grace
Sobers
Imran
Kallis
Miller
Procter
Botham
Rhodes
Pollock
Dev
Faulkner
Jadeja
Hadlee
Shakib
Being good on both disciplines really, not really focused on the same time being.Does balanced mean to be very close in both discipline only, or being so at the same time?
Wouldn't Faulkner be more balanced than Rhodes? (I do rate Rhodes particularly high because of left arm spin bias).
Did any Bangladeshi make into any list other than shakib? (Please don't get pissed)Being good on both disciplines really, not really focused on the same time being.
Vettori is too low buddy.. No brownie points for those glasses?Flintoff - 28
Vettori - 47
Vettori averaged 38 without minnows..... That's a bit too much imo for a frontline spinner. Great ODI bowler though!Vettori is too low buddy.. No brownie points for those glasses?