PlayerComparisons
International Captain
Two keepers
It's hard to rate Bairstow's career, because he spent about 70 tests being the poster boy for filler specialist batsmen with his mighty average of 34 or whatever it was.Thought this would be closer
World Cup excluded.Very good player atm.
The RPW difference could be partly down to NZ having better batters and worse bowlers tbf. Not a fan of RPWIt is definitely close.
Bairstow has done better against big teams, but suffered the bigger penalty because he had to play them more.
Things like that happen a lot in cricket and it goes over the heads of Average merchants. And before longevity or consistency etc is discussed, the 2017-2021 opposition and conditions combination that Jonny faced would have killed many decent players like Watling and Prior.
New Zealand batting conditions and New Zealand's opposition schedule are both more favourable tools for sustaining a long career.
Average RPW in their tests...
Watling 34.5
Bairstow 30.8
Significant difference. Watling had better batting conditions and played big teams less often.
Watling does have a lot of tidy knocks though, and going with the completed career is always understandable when the active player isn't indisputably better/more accomplished.
I feel pretty sure that New Zealand was a more batsman-friendly place than England during Watling's career tbh. The 2022 English summer was reminiscent of a New Zealand summer. Ball going to sleep after the first session and the middle order helping themselves. Bairstow in particular ran riot funnily enough.The RPW difference could be partly down to NZ having better batters and worse bowlers tbf. Not a fan of RPW
Yea that’s possibly true. I think the difference in quality of batters and bowlers is also a factor tho.I feel pretty sure that New Zealand was a more batsman-friendly place than England during Watling's career tbh. The 2022 English summer was reminiscent of a New Zealand summer. Ball going to sleep after the first session and the middle order helping themselves. Get the occasional minefield in New Zealand like the 2020 India series, but it has generally been a very good place for batting in recent times.
It might be and thus RPW is far from perfect. But I still think Bairstow has faced stronger bowling and tougher batting conditions across his career.Yea that’s possibly true. I think the difference in quality of batters and bowlers is also a factor tho.
Gun postBairstow has done better against big teams, but suffered the bigger penalty because he had to play them more.
Things like that happen a lot in cricket and it goes over the heads of Average merchants. And before longevity or consistency etc is discussed, the 2017-2021 opposition and conditions combination that Jonny faced would have killed many decent players like Watling and Prior.
New Zealand batting conditions and New Zealand's opposition schedule are both more favourable tools for sustaining a long career.
Average RPW in their tests...
Watling 34.5
Bairstow 30.8
Significant difference. Watling had better batting conditions and played big teams less often.
Watling does have some tidy knocks though, and going with the completed career is understandable when the active player isn't indisputably better/more accomplished.
Yeah I probably shouldn't have mentioned RPW as it's not needed. I think we all know New Zealand was an easier place to bat than England during the time Watling and Bairstow's careers overlapped.Gun post
Not a fan of RPW though.
If we’re going to rate players higher for harder home conditions then i guess that means G Smith > Hayden and Kallis > PontingYeah I probably shouldn't have mentioned RPW as it's not needed. I think we all know New Zealand was an easier place to bat than England during the time Watling and Bairstow's careers overlapped.
But I didn't say that. Look at the post before that. My point was it's been tougher for Bairstow to sustain a strong average and resume because he's had the harsher batting conditions at home and played big teams more frequently. I voted for Bairstow because I think he's done better against big teams, but I think Watling is a fair vote here for a few reasons.If we’re going to rate players higher for harder home conditions then i guess that means G Smith > Hayden and Kallis > Ponting
This but unironically.If we’re going to rate players higher for harder home conditions then i guess that means G Smith > Hayden and Kallis > Ponting
I think this is a not unpopular opinion here.If we’re going to rate players higher for harder home conditions then i guess that means G Smith > Hayden and Kallis > Ponting