Go get some sleepThere are many doppelganger exist in modern cricket.
Bond doppelganger - Mat Henry
McGrath Doppelganger - Hazlewood
Dale Steyn doppelganger - Rabada
Walsh Doppelganger - Holder.
That wouldn't be enough.Go get some sleep
You had me until here.There are many doppelganger exist in modern cricket.
Bond doppelganger - Mat Henry
McGrath Doppelganger - Hazlewood
Dale Steyn doppelganger - Rabada
Walsh Doppelganger - Holder.
Disagree. Bishop contributed greatly in the series in Australia in 1993 which they won 2-1. Also had one other very good series there. Also had a very good series in 1995 in England. Don't think Bond did nearly as much away from home.Bishop definitely had the better test career, but mostly due to length of career (which were both shortened) but went with Bond here because he had just a bit more ability and higher ceiling imo. Basing this on a hypothetical that both Bishop and Bond have a full career, I think Bond does better.
Even in their shortened careers Bond achieved a higher level imo.
Yeah but Bond didn't really get to play away series against top sides except WI, against which he was a major factor in the away series win. The higher level imo is mostly based of the eye test and some stats (Bond wins easily on both avg and Match factor, although he's played weaker opposition).Disagree. Bishop contributed greatly in the series in Australia in 1993 which they won 2-1. Also had one other very good series there. Also had a very good series in 1995 in England. Don't think Bond did nearly as much away from home.
And Bishop's late outswingers are out of this world.
That'd be a really useless metric here. Bishop played with an Ambrose who took 33 wickets @16 in the 1993 series in Australia, and some other mention-worthy bowlers. Also played against stronger opponents. Bonds away numbers are carried by WI and ZIM.Yeah but Bond didn't really get to play away series against top sides except WI, against which he was a major factor in the away series win. The higher level imo is mostly based of the eye test and some stats (Bond wins easily on both avg and Match factor, although he's played weaker opposition).
And Bond's late inswingers are out of this world too.
That'd be a really useless metric here. Bishop played with an Ambrose who took 33 wickets @16 in the 1993 series in Australia, and some other mention-worthy bowlers. Also played against stronger opponents. Bonds away numbers are carried by WI and ZIM.
The delivery at 0:43 is greater than Bond's whole career.
Yeah decent, Shaheen Afridi level imo.Talk to me when Bishop comes near to this.
Would be Bangladesh's greatest pacer ever tbhYeah decent, Shaheen Afridi level imo.
Where are you even going with this??? Name a bowler that wouldn't be.Would be Bangladesh's greatest pacer ever tbh
Rubel HosseinWhere are you even going with this? Name a bowler that wouldn't be.
He wouldn't be, he already is.Rubel Hossein
Aaron had the potential, just didn't get enough game time to increase that averageHe wouldn't be, he already is.
Talk to me when one of your full time fast bowlers average 76.