Better Test bowling attack?

[shortpitched713]

Comparison based off silly idea of mine.

1) Tall dude: Ambrose v McGrath
2) "Short" dude: Marshall v Steyn
3) Agressive dude: Lillee v Donald
4) Spinny dude: Warne v Murali

Also choosing solely based on bowling prowess of the two attacks, not batting depth. Note, we left Garner out of this comparison, and for good reason.

 

[Johan]

Marshall>Steyn
McGrath>Ambrose
Lillee~Donald
Warne~Murali

Cool team because of Marshall and Warne's batting

 

[DrWolverine]

McGrath. Steyn. Donald. Muralitharan.

 

[honestbharani]

Marshall > Steyn
Ambrose > McGrath
Lillee > Donald
Warne < Murali

 

[subshakerz]

After considering I think the first team has a slight edge.

McGrath and Steyn will be an amazing new ball duo. Donald might not be ideal for third seamer but he gives full pace and inswing to Steyns outswing.

Steyn gives reverse too.

There is a question mark over Lillee and Ambrose in SC.

 

[DrWolverine]

There is a question mark over Lillee and Ambrose in SC.

Marshall. Lillee. Warne. Ambrose.
3 of them failed or unproven in India.

 

[subshakerz]

Well this

Marshall. Lillee. Warne. Ambrose.
3 of them failed or unproven in India.

This lineup is better in Aus though.

 

[DrWolverine]

This lineup is better in Aus though.

True.

 

[reyrey]

Close, but I'd have Marshall/Ambrose/Lillee/Warne ahead based on pure intimidation factor.

 

[kyear2]

Marshall. Lillee. Warne. Ambrose.
3 of them failed or unproven in India.

Think Warne's issue was India in general,.don't think the location mattered much tbh.

 

[Fuller Pilch]

Different "style" of attack, but this is just as good if not better than the other 2:

Hadlee
Wasim
Garner
O'Reilly

 

[Prince EWS]

Comparison based off silly idea of mine.

1) Tall dude: Ambrose v McGrath
2) "Short" dude: Marshall v Steyn
3) Agressive dude: Lillee v Donald
4) Spinny dude: Warne v Murali

Also choosing solely based on bowling prowess of the two attacks, not batting depth. Note, we left Garner out of this comparison, and for good reason.

For his batting?

 

[shortpitched713]

For his batting?

Even though I stated clearly to pick based on bowling and not batting, with the presence of Garner, people wouldn't be able to help themselves.