• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Best Test Teams Decade-wise

Xix2565

International Debutant
Don't seem like the consistent best options beyond home grounds and peaks, and some of them didn't play most of the decade involved.
 

Coronis

Cricketer Of The Year
Don't seem like the consistent best options beyond home grounds and peaks, and some of them didn't play most of the decade involved.
This occurs a lot in all decade teams, due to players who may have only played a half decade having clearly superior records to others who played the whole decade. It depends what you think is more important, players who were playing the whole decade or the highest skill level of players who played in that decade.
 

Xix2565

International Debutant
I personally think skill matters a lot more than longevity at that stage. Especially when it's not like conditions and talent has been consistent throughout the decade. And I don't think that some of the picks here have that strong an argument for being here compared to their peers in roles.
 

Fuller Pilch

Hall of Fame Member
2011 – 2020

Aliaster Cook
David Warner
Steven Smith
Kumara Sangakkara
Joe Root
A.B devilliers
Ben Stokes
Ravi Ashwin
Mitchell Johnson
Stuart Broad
James Anderson
Considering England were probably only the 5th or 6th best team of the decade it seems excessive to have five of their players in the team.
5 from England!, 3 from Australia, and one each from India, SA, and SL. Yes to Cook and Anderson. No to the rest.
 
Last edited:

Gob

International Coach
Considering England were probably only the 5th or 6th best team of the decade it seems excessive to have five of their players in the team.
5 from England!, 3 from Australia, and one each from India, SA, and SL. Yes to Cook and Anderson. No to the rest.
Stokes has a perfectly fine case
 

Fuller Pilch

Hall of Fame Member
Stokes has a perfectly fine case
Yes, but so do many others. We could play six soecialist batsmen as there many elite players who missed out, but Watling as 7 instead of Stokes.

We could also pick a 7-8-9 of Holder, Ashwin, Philander.

Re other allrounders

Shakib - better batter and better bowler than Stokes.
Jadeja - slightly worse batter, considerably better bowler than Stokes.
CDG - sadly didn't play more tests. Better batting and bowling averages. Much better bowler.
Holder - inferior batsman but considerably better bowler.
Hafeez - only Shakib was better at batting, interesting bowler.
 
1940s
Hutton
Morris
Bradman(C)
Compton
Harvey/Nourse
Weekes
Miller
Tallon+
Lindwall
Johnston
Bedser

1930s
Sutcliffe
Hutton
Bradman(C)
Hammond
Headley
Nourse
McCabe/Cowie
Ames+
Verity
Larwood
O’Reilly

1920s
Hobbs
Sutcliffe
Hammond
McCarthy
Woolley
Hendren
Gregory
Tate
Oldfield+
Mcdonald
Grimmett
 

trundler

Request Your Custom Title Now!
1940s
Hutton
Morris
Bradman(C)
Compton
Harvey/Nourse
Weekes
Miller
Tallon+
Lindwall
Johnston
Bedser

1930s
Sutcliffe
Hutton
Bradman(C)
Hammond
Headley
Nourse
McCabe/Cowie
Ames+
Verity
Larwood
O’Reilly

1920s
Hobbs
Sutcliffe
Hammond
McCarthy
Woolley
Hendren
Gregory
Tate
Oldfield+
Mcdonald
Grimmett
Bruce Mitchell in the '30s.
 

Top