But common sense works like this.open365 said:Crickt doesn't work like that.
Being a lower class batsman genraly means that you won't have the appetitie and application for big scores,no matter who you are batting against.
You'll find that a lot of the youth thrown into the Bangladesh national team didn't impress in the domestic comp but in winning performances for the u-19's. They rate those performances very highly yet don't count towards the First Class stats.Loony BoB said:Quite possibly the following could influence things...
2) The older players in the Bangladeshi leagues may have the better averages, but are not selected because Bangladesh are trying to build on a young team rather than an old one.
3) Again regarding youth, they may have played very few FC games but have just shown talent and potential, and are being selected before they have a chance to gain a lot of experience in their domestic league.
But they are't less talented opposition if your also less talented.Hero_Don said:But common sense works like this.
You perform better against less talented opposition.
No. Common sense suggests you should, if you perform to your capabilities, get better results against less talented opposition than against better opposition.Hero_Don said:But common sense works like this.
You perform better against less talented opposition.
Exactly right. That's how it occurred that I batted number 1 and captained my school 3rd XI last year, despite having a career average of approximately 17.open365 said:But they are't less talented opposition if your also less talented.
As you go further down the cricketing talent tree,the scores get lower and lower.
It takes talent and a massive amount of ability to consistenly score big,no ,matter who you play against,and i'm guessing that Bangladeshi FC batsmen don't have that talent/ability.
It's the way cricket works.
And they beat India as well in 2004 and Pakistan in 1999 and have won 1 match against Zimbabwe by 8 runs before Streak and co. went on a strike. That, happened to be their 1st ever ODI win after the historic win against Pakistan in 1999.andyc said:Meh who cares. They still beat Sri Lanka (and us).
?tooextracool said:one would think that the reason behind that is that the batting performances are well split but extremely inconsistent. so a possible scenario is that a different batsman scores runs in ever game.
Not when you're not talented yourself.Hero_Don said:But common sense works like this.
You perform better against less talented opposition.
take this example. in 5 games, 5 different batsmen score 100s in each of them, but every player fails miserably in their other innings. that would result in an average of 25ish, but it might also mean that the bowlers have been taken to the cleaners.open365 said:
Well neither are likely to be that meaningful.James90 said:You'll find that a lot of the youth thrown into the Bangladesh national team didn't impress in the domestic comp but in winning performances for the u-19's. They rate those performances very highly yet don't count towards the First Class stats.
But then the bowlers should have splendid averages, which they dont.open365 said:Crickt doesn't work like that.
Being a lower class batsman genraly means that you won't have the appetitie and application for big scores,no matter who you are batting against.
Golam's been all over the shop this year, had a superb season last year though.Samuel_Vimes said:Not when you're not talented yourself.
There's one exception, though:
Golam Rahman (17 matches, 1382 runs @ 51.18)