Athlai
Not Terrible
Also not safe around children 4 years or younger.Bond21, you remind me of slinkies - Not really good for anything but they bring a smile to your face when pushed down the stairs.
Also not safe around children 4 years or younger.Bond21, you remind me of slinkies - Not really good for anything but they bring a smile to your face when pushed down the stairs.
Basically our team anyway.New Zealand Under 30's
Michael Pappps
Lou Vincent
Peter Fulton
Jesse Ryder
Ross Taylor
Jacob Oram
Brendon McCullum
Daniel Vettori
James Franklin
Kyle Mills
Jeetan Patel
Without Styris, Fleming, Bond, Martin and Cumming.Basically our team anyway.
Pomersbach and Butterworth? They've got 14 games of FC experience between them.Thornley? lol.
Jaques
North
Clarke*
Pomersbach
White
Butterworth
Ronchi+
McDonald
Johnson
Tait
Hilfenhaus
Rekon Wade will be an absolute gun but has only played 1 season so far being 19.
Pomersbach and Butterworth? They've got 14 games of FC experience between them.
Also, don't see what's so funny about Dominic Thornely. Averages 46 in the Pura Cup which is more than can be said for North, Clarke and White.
But he's not at the moment.Yep Butterworth will be a gun, just you wait and see.
He has serious talent, you only need to see what he did in last years Pura Cup final to know this.But he's not at the moment.
Did I deny he has talent? No, I just said he isn't a gun at the moment, which he isn't. I'm pretty sure he will be, but you shouldn't pick hypothetical teams like this based just on talent IMO, especially when there are other candidates who have performed better over a longer period of time.He has serious talent, you only need to see what he did in last years Pura Cup final to know this.
Why?Did I deny he has talent? No, I just said he isn't a gun at the moment, which he isn't. I'm pretty sure he will be, but you shouldn't pick hypothetical teams like this based just on talent IMO, especially when there are other candidates who have performed better over a longer period of time.
You should pick a team with players who have contributed the most, whether it be with the bat or ball.Why?
It's better then just picking the 11 players with the best stats..
LOL that's absurd!!You should pick a team with players who have contributed the most, whether it be with the bat or ball.
Pick the best team. The West Indies of the 1980's didn't worry about a spinner because they had atleast four fast bowlers who were all better than their best slow bowler. Seeing as it's a hypothetical side, I wouldn't have any trouble with it consisting solely of 29 year olds if they were the best players.LOL that's absurd!!
Balance is very important. No point picking 11 29 year olds in your side or picking the 4 bowlers who have contributed the most with the ball if they are all swing bowlers or something.